Skip to comments.
Judge postpones decision in CNN lawsuit over Jim Acosta's press pass
CNN Business ^
| November 15, 2018
| Brian Stelter
Posted on 11/15/2018 11:01:00 AM PST by jazusamo
(CNN)Lawyers for CNN and the Trump administration are awaiting an initial ruling on the network's federal lawsuit over press access to the White House.
And they're going to have to wait a little while longer. Judge Timothy J. Kelly heard nearly two hours of oral arguments about CNN's request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on Wednesday. Then he said court would reconvene Thursday at 3 p.m.
But on Thursday afternoon, he rescheduled the next hearing for Friday at 10 a.m.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acosta; cnnlawsuit; judgekelly; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
1
posted on
11/15/2018 11:01:00 AM PST
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
WHAT’S THERE TO THINK ABOUT!??!?
Sorry.
2
posted on
11/15/2018 11:01:58 AM PST
by
dp0622
(The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
To: jazusamo
No court...including the US Supreme Court...has a right to tell the White House who they can give press passes to or not.
3
posted on
11/15/2018 11:02:31 AM PST
by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: jazusamo
No standing. No Constitutional right. NEXT !
4
posted on
11/15/2018 11:03:33 AM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
("It's Slappin' Time !")
To: jazusamo
5
posted on
11/15/2018 11:05:47 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
To: dp0622; MeganC; fieldmarshaldj
Agree, I don’t like the look of this postponement.
6
posted on
11/15/2018 11:06:43 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
Should have been an automatic. Case Dismissed with Prejudice. CNN lawyers sanctioned and must pay all court costs and legal costs of the government in this case.
To: rigelkentaurus
It doesn’t take an extra day to say no.
8
posted on
11/15/2018 11:09:00 AM PST
by
TheConservator
(All the blather about TrumpÂ’s violation of the law is simply a projection of their own lawlessness.)
To: MeganC
No court...including the US Supreme Court...has a right to tell the White House who they can give press passes to or not.
If they rule that way Alex Jones should demand one. That should tie our entire Federal court system in knots for the next thirteen years.
To: jazusamo
Why?
It’s straightforward without their arguments
10
posted on
11/15/2018 11:10:46 AM PST
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
To: jazusamo
LOL, I’ve seen pessimists before but brother, you take the cake.
To: jazusamo
OFFS! Srsly? Fraud waste abuse.
12
posted on
11/15/2018 11:11:04 AM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH? #My2nd)
To: jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Good. There is no “emergency” here. There never was an emergency.
This allows for additional civilized White House press conferences to be held without that flaming @sshole Acosta disrupting things as usual.
Hey Little Jimmy PeePee Pants, better stock up on those hospital grade Depends! And please change them regularly, you smell like sh*t.
14
posted on
11/15/2018 11:13:42 AM PST
by
RooRoobird20
("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
To: jazusamo
Maybe he’ll postpone the next hearing until December 1st ... of 2030. :-P
15
posted on
11/15/2018 11:13:51 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
MAGA!Support Free Republic, Folks!
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
16
posted on
11/15/2018 11:14:24 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
I don’t get this whole Acosta thing. “Freedom of the Press” means reporters can say what they want (within limits) without fear of prosecution. It has nothing to do with providing them access of any sort.
To: jazusamo
I am looking for the part of the constitution that vests executive power in district court judges
To: dp0622
Yeah but not how you think. Many feel this will be resolved in CNN’s favor very quickly.
19
posted on
11/15/2018 11:16:32 AM PST
by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: Alberta's Child
That’d work just fine. :^)
20
posted on
11/15/2018 11:16:53 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
