Lawyer up.
he has a point. It is time for someone to sue twitter for the offensive, false attacks made by twitter users.
When Twitter tries to defend itself as merely a “platform”, depositions can be held, using discovery to get the details of how twitter makes these decisions to blacklist conservatives.
And I have no doubt that these depositions will prove that twitter is making editorial decisions not based on generic principles like “personal attacks” or “offensive content”.
And once it can be shown that twitter is, in fact, making editorial decisions on CONTENT, they can then be held responsible for every attack they allow to stay on their media, just like a newspaper could be held responsible for publishing false letters to the editor that slander other private citizens.
Yea, but I believe it’s their right to do so. And I’m not sure I agree with the author’s basic premise.
Question....What would you consider Free Republic (a forum obviously), but given the choice, a publisher or a platform?
Lawyer up.
The only reason I have Twitter is to read the Presidential tweets . One can only imagine the fall out if he got banned.
If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.
What possessed this guy to think he could associate with facists?
Sue Twitter for defamation of character embodied in the act of shutting down his account.
The fact that conservatives are upset over Twitter shows just how remarkable and invaluable an invention it is.
Why can’t conservatives compete in the tech game?
Here is the left’s plan; (which appears to me to be organized and coordinated between silicon valley and portions of the deep state)
1) Censor all non-liberals from the primary social media platforms
2a) All non-liberals are successfully censored and have no major alternative platforms. Desirable outcome
2b) Non-liberal media sources, publishers and content creators successfully migrate to alternative platforms and grow their exposure organically.
3a) The censored are still censored
3b) A major coordinated campaign is begun in the MSM to associate all the moderate non-liberal publishers with the radical ulta-right hate-groups, included faux groups created or sponsored by the deep state as well as to tie them all to any crimes or negative news stores, or perhaps false-flag ops.
4a) The censored are still censored
4b) Prosecution begins against the alternative platforms to censor all the un-censored non-liberal publishers
If Jim Acosta has a Constitutional right to a Hard press pass, then Twitter should not be able to suspend people with out due process.
remember, twitter needs us, we don’t need them.
send them the message by logging off for good.
Just caught another suspension myself a few days ago. Having an argument with a lib over the border and that it is coming to the point that we will need Marines posted at the border, one in the chamber and weapons free order given.
Got reported by a couple libs and that was it; one week ban.
Why do we even go on Twitter? It’s America’s bathroom wall. GET OFF IT AND STOP SUPPORTING THEM. Same thing with Facebook. I am weaning off. I am sure my life will be better.