Skip to comments.A Tale of Two Presidents
Posted on 12/04/2018 5:30:03 PM PST by Kaslin
President Donald Trump and the first lady's graceful tribute to the late George H.W. Bush underscored, a little awkwardly, one reason for the tone and fragrance of all the obituary tributes we're reading.
The Trumps praised -- with unimpeachable dignity -- Bush's "essential authenticity, disarming wit, and unwavering commitment to faith, family, and country," together with his "sound judgment and unflappable leadership." This string of attributes strikes many, I'm sure, as precisely the stuff some future president won't be saying about Trump. As if Trump -- who knows exactly who he is and isn't -- really cared!
The late George Herbert Walker Bush was indeed a man of many excellences. That the personal variety excite more praise than the political ones shows us a thing or two about national leadership: its demands and rigors.
Not always, but often enough to give us considerable pause, important national leaders are decidedly -- well, maybe not weird or crazy -- but certainly non-normal. Think of FDR. Think of Churchill and DeGaulle. Think of LBJ and Bill Clinton. They aren't like us, and we're not like them -- a fact that illuminates to some degree the rise and pugnacious durability of Trump. You might not want to spend a lot of face time with him, but you might well want him to straighten out some things in need of straightening: a task, assuming he agreed with you or saw value in your analysis, that he'd be happy to take on, claiming full credit all the way.
The near-normality of "H.W." -- by presidential standards -- was both his chief feature and failing. He was, I believe, as nice and gentlemanly and kind and decent as tributes make him out to have been. He handwrote thank-you notes. Who in politics does that anymore?
And yet, as national leader, Bush lacked ... what to call it ... ruthlessness? Maybe something like that. A ruthlessness stemming from burning belief that thus-and-so had to be done for the national good, and was damn well -- pardon my French -- going to get done.
His good intentions and high motives seemed less part of a vision -- a picture of how things should be -- than of a strategy for operating in a good-neighborish, almost Rockwellian, environment. Of tragedy and necessity he seemed to have only a limited grasp. You can't help but wonder how much world history he studied at Yale, and with how much attention.
Bush was mocked for an offhand reference he once made to "the vision thing" -- a semi-dismissal purportedly showing his indifference to any governing philosophy beyond, commendably enough, integrity and efficiency. In other words, how come he wanted to be president? Was that all there was to it -- paying the bills and keeping the lights on?
There came a moment in our tumultuous time when, soured on feckless, foggy, self-interested politicians, the voters -- roughly half of them anyway -- decided it was time for a vision with flesh and teeth, namely, the vision of Donald Trump: no handwritten thank-yous, but lots and lots of action. And rhetoric: nothing like they teach at Yale, or used to, but coarse and unsparing. Unsurprisingly, George H.W. Bush is reported to have voted in 2016 for Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton! Well ...
De mortuis nil nisi bonum -- of the dead say nothing but good -- is the rule of thumb in the obituary trade. Believe me when I submit that George Herbert Walker Bush deserves -- not in accordance with ancient maxims, but rather on account of personal merit -- the highest, most fervent praises.
What history -- whatever that may mean -- will say about the deportment and records of the gentleman-in-politics and the ruffian-in-politics is more than we senior citizens can expect to find out. I will content myself with a guess: It is that we need both types to attempt different things in different ways at different times. Nor can we expect from either type the fulfillment of every human expectation and need. "Put not your trust in princes" is the counsel of the Psalmist. I've never heard better.
Think how much easier Trump’s job of saving America would be if Bush would have given him the least bit of respect for winning. Instead the low life SOB had all the time in the world for Obama and Bill Clinton.
The Caine Mutiny movie addressed this very concept. What if Trump got a little support from his own party right when he needed it? Imagine the effect it could have had.
Where has “The Won” been the last few days?
The very nature of the business repels so-called normal people from engaging in it professionally. Oh some come to it later in life out of mainly altruistic motives, but the professional politician... that is a strange breed of cat. And usually not in a healthy manner. Hollywood for ugly people?
George H W Bush was a good man, maybe even a great man. But as a politician he was an amateur playing with the pros (see the Clintons, and Stephanopoulus, and Carville, etc).
He did handle himself with grace and dignity while going onto his maker. Unlike McStain who was issuing evil eye curses from his death bed.
I dont have a problem with Trump. I think he speaks the truth, harshly at times, but I dont find it offensive. He uses it as a tool.
People dont realize he was well brought up, educated in the finest schools so any crass behavior is a tool wielded by an expert.
Imagine the extent of M.A.G.A. we could have had if Trump had received a little cooperation from the RATs and MSM.
It would have been a WIN-WIN-WIN for the entire planet.
Who cares? The less I see or hear of him, the best I like it? Don’t you?
Very well said.
For good or ill, Trump has shaken America from the dull apathy of the Obama years, and is slowly but effectively uncovering the almost unbelievable corruption that is Washington, D.C. His bluster makes for a very effective distraction as Washington is revealed in all its sordid detail.
I’m just surprised that the LSM are not promoting him at this time, when they would be thinking that he was the most classy POTUS EVER!
yes he also went to Military high school.
Where’s the link to Hillary’s response?
“...one reason for the tone and fragrance of all the obituary tributes we’re reading.”
I’ve come across that very fragrance when passing a freshly-fertilized field.
Your children will read about Trump in the leftist history books as being a bad person, but if they dig, they’ll find that in spite of a rough manner, Trump accomplished things that your “nice” Presidents (e.g., The Messiah) could only dream of accomplishing. Sorry Kaslin, facts are facts/
President Trump ran and got elected to save America from the Bush Plan for North Mexico (aka USA).
Of course they wouldn’t support that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.