[taxcontrol]

Bibas said the majority erred because laws that impair self-defense in the home warrant strict scrutiny, not intermediate scrutiny as the other judges selected.

I am of the opinion that ANY law that reduces, restricts or otherwise infringes on liberty, but especially any of the Bill of Rights "rights" - should require strict scrutiny.

[2harddrive]

Let’s do an Einsteinian THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: Would a ban on BOOKS over 10 pages violate the First Amendment? What about a ban on speeches or TV programs over 10 minutes? Seems equivalent to me.