Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supremedoctrine

ahhh….we all see it. We even vote accordingly. And it doesn’t make one damn bit of difference. Sometimes I wonder if we’ve had a decent, pro-American President between Eisenhower and Trump.


16 posted on 12/06/2018 1:20:13 PM PST by grania ("You don't give power to an angry left wing mob")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: grania

.
Two of them, Kennedy, and Reagan, and both took bullets!


17 posted on 12/06/2018 1:22:46 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: grania; Lurkinanloomin
What Rush and many others don't seem to understand nor comprehend is the motivation for population substitution and (re)implementation of traditional feudal order & control.

And no, it's not all about a quest for power; consider that many/most of the engineers & proponents of globalism come from from old line established wealth. So, in a weird way, globalism is really a manifestation of noblesse oblige, where the elite are essentially obliged to help direct & manage the ignorant masses. Which gets us back to motivation, and the predominance of bored ennui vs rabid hunger. (Note: a distinction is made here between Rockefellers and grifters like the Clintons.)

However, with the advent of nuclear weapons, an existential threat is posed to humanity as mankind begins to feel the tightening effects of constrained supply. And who is the most likely culprit for upping the game in order to win the spoils? Well, let me ask you this question: which race has dominated, dictated and determined history for the last 2,500 years? So, we have perhaps the most coldly violent (as opposed to mercurial poor impulse control) with a lot of built in expectations about what they want and how they plan on maintaining it.

The solution, as far as the globalists are concerned, is to render Western man neutered, so they he may not influence the coming territorial battles and resource wars, nor carry their collective baggage of expectations about standards of living. Voila, replace whites with other races, who have no institutional memory whatsoever of any kind of wealth, political participation, knowledge or even base IQ that would allow them to discern exactly what's going down.

In this fashion, a cloistered elite can govern the world characterized by radically reduced circumstances. With limited resources, scientific discovery and technical advances can still be maintained by reserving the lion's share of resources towards favored projects. The new composed mass of humanity can literally return to subsistence farming for all they care.

This is what's driving globalism, or as Bush I said "a new world order". Not a desire for fanciful, Hollywood type mad power, but a very real understanding of the challenges that lie ahead.

20 posted on 12/06/2018 1:47:50 PM PST by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson