Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chris Matthews Suggests: 'Witch Hunt' to Impeach Trump for Covering Up Affairs
Newsbusters.org ^ | December 10, 2018 | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 12/10/2018 8:14:18 PM PST by Kaslin

Was Chris Matthews suddenly struck by some semblance of fairness? Or is the Bill Clinton fan, and the man who has described notorious womanizer JFK as a "hero," reluctant to condemn presidents for their peccadilloes?

On his Hardball show this evening, Matthews suggested that impeaching a President over sexual misbehavior would be a "witch hunt." Said Matthews, posing the question to Dem Rep. Hakeem Jeffries:

Chris Matthews: 'Witch Hunt' to Impeach Trump for Covering Up Affairs

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think you can actually impeach a President for basically covering up sexual misbehavior? I mean, we had this with Clinton. Everything is different in life, but it was somewhat related. And it never seemed right: that that would be the basis for throwing a guy out of the presidency. To a lot of, certainly progressives and middle-of-the-roaders --and journalists in some cases. It seemed to be a witch hunt, to use the phrase used lately. How do you impeach a President for his sexual misconduct, covered up, even if it is illegal?

It's not just shocking that Matthews would employ a Trumpian term. Twenty years ago, when Hardball was on CNBC, Matthews was seen as tough on Bill Clinton's adultery with Monica Lewinsky. Last year, he confessed to Stephanie Ruhle "I'm trying to make up for the fact that I think I was too tough on Clinton."  Ruhle had insisted "We called it the Lewinsky scandal, we didn't call it the Clinton scandal, and we looked at Monica Lewinsky as a villain—come on, Chris, she was a victim."

Note: before posing his question to Jeffries, Matthews lavished praise on the New York congressman:

"You've got a big role in the Democratic party now. I know all about it. I'm watching your career. I've spotted you, you are on your way. Congratulations. You may be Speaker at some point fairly soon."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2016presidential; billclinton; campaignselections; chrismatthews; hardball; impeachment; johnkennedy; media; msm; pmsnbc; politicalscandals; presidenttrump; sexscandals; sexuality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2018 8:14:18 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m sure Chris will get an attitude adjustment from upstairs at the network for that.

Lol


2 posted on 12/10/2018 8:36:45 PM PST by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Like one witch hunt was not already enough, huh, MatthewsIdiot?


3 posted on 12/10/2018 8:45:17 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Can’t impeach a President for something that happened before he took office.


4 posted on 12/10/2018 8:46:35 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Trump denies having had an affair with either of the women who blackmailed his campaign. Mathews wants to further the notion in the public’s mind that the affairs actually happened.


5 posted on 12/10/2018 8:49:38 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin


He must be a heavy drinker.

6 posted on 12/10/2018 9:10:28 PM PST by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WINNING WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Looks like Chrus brushes his hair with a Sunbeam Mixmaster.

Leni

7 posted on 12/10/2018 9:16:16 PM PST by MinuteGal ( MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Should be Chris instead of "Chrus" in my post above...but I sorta like "Chrus", too...as in "Chrus the Chris".

Must have been a Freudian slip.

Leni

8 posted on 12/10/2018 9:20:24 PM PST by MinuteGal ( MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

^5


9 posted on 12/10/2018 9:21:19 PM PST by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WINNING WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How was what Trump did illegal? Both sides agreed to a legal contract with attorneys and courts/arbiters involved.


10 posted on 12/10/2018 9:22:20 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
NY Democrat Jerry Nadler's comments were striking in part because he was on the Judiciary Committee that voted
to impeach Bill Clinton......at the time Nadler said that vote was tantamount to an attempted coup and a
gross abuse of the House's impeachment power.

NADLER'S INCIPIENT ALZHEIMERS?

freebeacon.com BY: Jack Heretik, August 26, 2018

NY Democrat Jerry Nadler was confronted about his comments–made during former President Bill Clinton's impeachment–saying a president can't commit obstruction of justice. NBC's MTP's Chuck Todd asked Nadler about his past comments, in which he was defending Clinton during the impeachment proceedings against him.".......back in 1999, during the debate about whether or not Bill Clinton obstructed justice, you said at the time you were not convinced that a president could obstruct justice," Todd said. "Do you feel that way, that it's not one of the quote ‘might not be impeachable,’ put it this way, that obstruction of justice might not be an impeachable offense?"

A DEMOCRAT-INDUCED MEMORY---- "Well, I don't remember saying that, but if I said it, I said it, but no, I don't agree with that today. A president, anybody can obstruct justice," Nadler said. "Obstruction of justice under certain circumstances might be an impeachable offense. Remember, there is a very big difference between a crime which may or may not be impeachable and an impeachable offense which doesn't have to be a crime."

=================================

Nadler has been a member of Congress since 1992 and was part to the Clinton impeachment proceedings. In a 1998 floor speech, Nadler said Clinton perjuring himself was not an impeachable offense."Perjury is a serious crime and, if provable, should be prosecuted in a court of law. But it may or may not involve the president’s duties and performance in office. Perjury on a private matter, perjury regarding sex, is not a great and dangerous offense against the Nation. It is not an abuse of uniquely presidential power. It does not threaten our form of government. It is not an impeachable offense," Nalder said.

At the time Nadler said Clinton's perjury with regard to a private sexual affair did not threaten the Constitutional order; it is a crime but was not an impeachable offense. Perjury regarding an attempt by a president to subvert the Constitutional order, to aggrandize power probably, would be an impeachable offense."

======================================

That was then:
Nadler defended Clinton "eloquently," arguing the lewinskied Clinton shouldn't be impeached for lying to conceal his affair with an intern.

This is now:
incoming chair Nadler is itching to impeach Trump using discredited witnesses like porn star Stormy Daniels and her sleaze lawyer Michael Avenatti.

11 posted on 12/10/2018 9:22:44 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper

Unfortunately the House is the judge of what is an impeachable offense. Constitution does not define high crimes or limit them to the presidential term.


12 posted on 12/10/2018 10:36:16 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bookmark


13 posted on 12/10/2018 11:10:51 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Look up Nadler’s “pink” background at www.keywiki.org and then you’ll understand what a piece of Marxist shit he is.

No further comment needed at this time.


14 posted on 12/10/2018 11:18:38 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Not illegal. This is a show, for 2020 politics.


15 posted on 12/11/2018 2:11:14 AM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Do you think you can actually impeach a President for basically covering up sexual misbehavior?”

Make that alleged sexual behavior. I don’t think he screwed either of those women. He said he didn’t. Stormy is a public health risk. Don’t know anything about the other lady. There’s no convincing evidence of either happening.


16 posted on 12/11/2018 5:20:12 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper

It never happened


17 posted on 12/11/2018 5:26:14 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What is his position on the Congress cover up?


18 posted on 12/11/2018 6:21:56 AM PST by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I know that.

It’s just absurd that these treasoncrats think they can impeach President Trump for something that allegedly happened before he took office.


19 posted on 12/11/2018 7:35:13 AM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson