Up until Trump was elected, and all of the fake Russian Dossier / Corrupt FBI (Director Level) stuff started coming out, I thought all the Kennedy assassination stuff about a conspiracy was bunk. LHO was the loan nut shooter as far as I was concerned.
It turns out, LHO was CIA all along. This is pretty indisputable at this point. Once you get comfortable with the idea that the CIA was involved in the JFK murder, you start to get comfortable with the idea that the CIA at the time (at the top) were related by marriage, traveled in the same social circles, and generally had the idea that it was OK to bypass the President.
“It turns out, LHO was CIA all along. This is pretty indisputable at this point.”
I’ll dispute it. This hokum is textbook (the KGB textbook) fake news.
How is it "indisputable?"
If it were perpetrated by domestic spy agencies, right in the middle of the cold war, why didn’t they then pin it on communists in the aftermath? How tough would that be?
Here you have an admitted Marxist communist, defects to the Soviet Union, marries a Russian, etc. They weren’t that smart, and they weren’t that stupid. It makes no sense. The most logical conclusion is that Oswald was pretty much what he appeared to be, a wackjob with a rifle.
The coverup, and related oddities are interesting to look over. The truth of what happened in Dallas is probably a lot more mundane than anyone wants to admit.
My approach is practical. I was a science student and a shooting enthusiast in my youth. I cannot credit that Oswald did it alone with that Mauser under those circumstances and constraints of place and time. That leads me to consider conspiracy as a viable possibility.