Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the fossil fuel industry got the media to think climate change was debatable
The Washington Post ^ | January 10, 2019 | By Amy Westervelt (D-WaPo)

Posted on 01/10/2019 1:02:09 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Late last year, the Trump administration released the latest national climate assessment on Black Friday in what many assumed was an attempt to bury the document. If that was the plan, it backfired, and the assessment wound up earning more coverage than it probably would have otherwise. But much of that coverage perpetuated a decades-old practice, one that has been weaponized by the fossil fuel industry: false equivalence.

While print outlets aren’t perfect, TV news has lagged further behind on climate, often presenting climate contrarians as an equal and opposite balance to climate scientists. In coverage of the national climate assessment, for example, multiple cable news shows featured both climate scientists and climate deniers, as though the two are simply opposite sides of a debate.

Though some outlets have moved to extricate deniers from the conversation, too many television news programs continue to bring on “contrarian” experts, giving a platform to tired lies. I say “lies” because fossil fuel industry scientists debunked these theories themselves decades ago, so they are knowingly perpetuating falsehoods.

It’s well past time the media stopped allowing itself to be a tool in the fossil fuel industry’s information war. Oreskes likens the push for “balance” on climate change to journalists arguing over the final score of a baseball game. “If the Yankees beat the Red Sox 6-2, journalists would report that. They would not feel compelled to find someone to say actually the Red Sox won, or the score was 6-4,” she says.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; hoax; propaganda; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Amy Westervelt is an audio and print reporter who covers climate and gender, and sometimes the intersection of the two.

Joseph Goebbels was a German Nazi politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945.

1 posted on 01/10/2019 1:02:09 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Clouds are evil.


2 posted on 01/10/2019 1:04:56 PM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The power of the Washington Post, and its collaborators in the “mainstream media,” has far more power to propagandize and gaslight the public into believing what is not true than Big Oil does, ever did, or ever will.

That’s why so many believe in the pseudo-science of “global warming.”


3 posted on 01/10/2019 1:04:59 PM PST by sourcery (Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What an asinine article. No actual discussion of the details climate change science and why we should believe her view of it. She demands that we believe it just the establishment says so. That argument is called “Appeal to authority”, and it’s not a good way to persuade someone who actually has a brain.


4 posted on 01/10/2019 1:07:59 PM PST by arista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Democrats are arrogant, lying scum.


5 posted on 01/10/2019 1:10:01 PM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
> multiple cable news shows featured both climate scientists and climate deniers, as though the two are simply opposite sides of a debate <

But that's EXACTLY how a debate is supposed to be run. A pro side, and a con side.

The scariest part of the whole Climate Change issue is how successfully one side has silenced the other. The "deniers" are simply called liars, and are forced from the stage.

So much for the Age of Enlightenment. We are going back to Dark Ages thinking here. Persecute all who disagree!

I suppose we'll see something like this again. Galileo on trial:


6 posted on 01/10/2019 1:15:21 PM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How the global warming victim complex convinced the public that climate change was based on science.


7 posted on 01/10/2019 1:16:45 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And I’ll be Ol Amy has very biased bones in her body


8 posted on 01/10/2019 1:16:47 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat ("Mods/Indies/Dems/Non-voters" JOBS or MOBS? Are CRAZY DIMS REALLY who you want BACK in POWER?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova

More propaganda and brainwashing - the entire proposal is that the science (so called because it’s not) is unquestionable and any opposition is lies.


9 posted on 01/10/2019 1:17:44 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

Climate change IS debatable. It is clearly changing, but how fast and why are NOT “settled science.” Human activities undoubtedly play a part, but how much? Most importantly ‘would proposed solutions do anything?’ - almost certainly not, they are not even intended to do more than redistribute income from political enemies to political friends.


10 posted on 01/10/2019 1:17:54 PM PST by Glenmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

.
“Climate Deniers” are true scientists; climate scammers are criminals, and need prosecution!
.


11 posted on 01/10/2019 1:20:55 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

.
Amy Westervelt looks like her face got run over at the intersection of Genderscam and Climatescam!
.


12 posted on 01/10/2019 1:22:32 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What is climate change? Define.


13 posted on 01/10/2019 1:29:34 PM PST by Mikemurphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Oreskes likens the push for “balance” on climate change to journalists arguing over the final score of a baseball game. “If the Yankees beat the Red Sox 6-2, journalists would report that. They would not feel compelled to find someone to say actually the Red Sox won, or the score was 6-4,” she says.

The analogy would be wrong if there were still 5 innings
left to play. That is, the game isn’t over yet and the
result is still undecided. These people are trying to
convince the crowd that there is no point in staying till
the end.


14 posted on 01/10/2019 1:34:39 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Late last year, the Trump administration released the latest national climate assessment on Black Friday in what many assumed was an attempt to bury the document......


15 posted on 01/10/2019 1:38:11 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
fossil fuel industry scientists debunked these theories themselves

No they didn't - and her own link shows that.

16 posted on 01/10/2019 1:52:20 PM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s amazing that she goes through this entire thing without even stating what it is that is being denied.


17 posted on 01/10/2019 1:52:27 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
“If the Yankees beat the Red Sox 6-2, journalists would report that. They would not feel compelled to find someone to say actually the Red Sox won, or the score was 6-4,” she says.

Sports are the only thing the media tells the truth about, because:

1. The scores are important.

2. There are too many witnesses.

18 posted on 01/10/2019 2:04:57 PM PST by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arista
That argument is called “Appeal to authority”, and it’s not a good way to persuade someone who actually has a brain.

You assume the American voting public has brains. Actually this type of argument works very well in our current dumbed-down society.

19 posted on 01/10/2019 2:21:30 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson