Posted on 01/10/2019 1:02:09 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
And the very first lie out of the bag is:
Her implication that opponents of the Global Warming Scam Complex deny that “Climate Change” exists. Does anyone actually dispute that climates change all the time, and have been doing so since the formation of the atmosphere?
What I’d like to hear is her proof that the incredibly expensive remedies, taxes, carbon trading schemes, etc., would have any meaningful impact on the various climates. It would be fun because there is no such proof. Will it work if China opens new coal-fired power plants every few days? What is someone/everyone cheats? Who or what will regulate the activities of everyone on the entire globe? Oops—that’s the real purpose.
Who knew?
Well played sir!
Most of the Lefty Twitter “journalists” are too arrogant to delete their old tweets. :-)
If it’s “not debatable”, it’s not science.
If it’s “settled”, it’s not science.
Those in the Washington Post’s immediate orbit are about to get a foot of global warming!
Because it is debatable
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!
While print outlets aren’t perfect, TV news has lagged further behind on climate, often presenting climate contrarians as an equal and opposite balance to climate scientists. In coverage of the national climate assessment, for example, multiple cable news shows featured both climate scientists and climate deniers, as though the two are simply opposite sides of a debate.
"Presenting climate contrarians as an equal and opposite balance to climate scientists?" Climate Change must have affect their imagination. From what I see climate contrarians are hardly allowed to present any equal and opposite balance to climate "scientists," relegating opposition mainly to a few web sites.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.