To: MountainWalker
Think strategically. He should sign it, and start the wall. Then when it isn’t enough money or an appropriate structure, he should do the EO to do it right.
16 posted on
02/11/2019 6:37:04 PM PST by
grania
("We're all just pawns in their game")
To: grania
I think he should sign it and move on with alternative funding sources. And when we run out of beds, bus the criminals to Chuck and Nancy’s backyard and drop them off.
To: grania
The concessions I don’t think are worth it. Is being able to stand in front of a 55mi joke worth the 2020 photo op? If anything I think signing this turd sandwich weakens his hand at a national emergency. SCOTUS will likely tell him just to go back to Congress like he did the first time.
To: grania
There was never a invader beds limit until this disaster bill .
We now can stop and house and send back the invaders .
They set them lose on us.
This is a disaster .
31 posted on
02/11/2019 6:47:03 PM PST by
ncalburt
(Gop DC Globalists out themselves)
To: grania
Then what was the strategy behind the shutdown if he isn’t even getting $5 billion?
34 posted on
02/11/2019 6:49:14 PM PST by
Shadow44
To: grania
Absolutely not! This bill is written to piss off Trump supporters and turn them against Trump. As I read this, it restricts use of money for only bollard fencing, cannot build any wall with any other money until Sept 3019 and cannot build walls in any States Parks. It enhances the catch and release program and screws taxpayers out of 415 million to care for illegals. WTH there is nothing conservative in this bill anywhere. Sign a CR for one month and tell them to try again. He signs this even declaring a National Emergency will prevent any wall construction while the caravans flood this country.
199 posted on
02/14/2019 7:34:55 AM PST by
OldGoatCPO
(No Caitiff Choir of Angles will sing for me)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson