Posted on 02/14/2019 9:15:20 AM PST by Perseverando
Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
Democratically elected peoples assemblies historically have been known for their mediocrity, and the U.S. has been no different. The great champion of American democracy, Alexis de Tocqueville, in 1835 observed, I was surprised to find so much distinguished talent among the citizens and so little among the heads of the government. It is a constant fact that at the present day the ablest men in the United States are rarely placed at the head of affairs, a condition that worsens the more democratic the government becomes.
But over the last decade, the ineptitude of our Congressmen has increased dramatically, to the point that today Congress looks like the green room for the Gong Show. The last midterm especially brought to Washington some representatives whose abject ignorance of even basic math is astonishing, and whose embrace of ideas hostile to the American Constitutional order are frightening. More troubling, some of them have become the de facto leaders of the Democrat progressives, the mangy tail that today is wagging the already scrofulous dog. The possibilities for entertainment are many, but so are the dangers to our Republic.
The rising star of this dubious cohort is the toothy, goofy Representative from New York, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Her Mr. Ed grin and exophthalmic stare are ubiquitous on the internet and cable news. AOC she has already earned an honorific acronymhas become the face of the millennial fad of socialism that was given legs by Bernie Sanders insurgent presidential candidacy in 2016. For Dems obsessed with regaining power and smiting the hated Donald Trump, however, AOC, though too young to run for president, has better optics and publicity than yet another old white guy who has spent his years in the Senate comfortable with the establishment status quo.
AOC, on the other hand, represents the future of the Democrats, still advertised as the emerging Democratic majority, as a 2002 book of that name called it, comprising women, minorities, and the college-educated. This new coalition was supposed to do what Thomas Jefferson did to the Federalists in 1800 sink federalism into an abyss from which there will be no resurrection for it, as he accurately predicted. The election of Barack Obama seemingly confirmed the Dems optimism, and his carefully groomed successor, Hillary Clinton, promised to continue Obamas fundamental transformation of America.
Donald Trump, of course, stood athwart this arc of history yelling Hell, no! As the progressives tell the tale, Trump was carried aloft by the racist resentment of white working-class bitter clingers and deplorables. Colluding with the Rooskies to steal votes, and enabled by the undemocratic remnants of white supremacism like the Electoral College, Trump pulled off a coup and deprived the Democrats of their end-of-history consummation.
In reality, the Dems wounds were self-inflicted. Instead of heeding the counsel of Bill and moving to the center and reaching out to the forgotten men and women of the working class, Hillary endorsed the new New Left. She didnt even campaign in the states that pushed Trump over the Electoral College finish line. And then the Democrats drew all the wrong lessons from their shellacking.
The high profile of AOC is the premier example of this lapse in political judgment and blind hubris. Sure, shes young and hip, as the bougie techno-dorks define that term. Shes got a lot of idealistic pep, an emotion prized by those who think enthusiasm and idealism are more important than coherent ideas, philosophical integrity, moral probity, and practical wisdom. And most important for the diversicrat left, shes a Latina, one of those people of color who usually on closer inspection turn out to be indistinguishable from a white person of similar education and socio-economic privilege. Not many farmworkers or maids grow up, as AOC did, with a nickname like Sandy. Shes what Thomas Sowell calls a mascot for white progressives for whom diversity is only skin-deep.
Unfortunately, Ocasio-Cortez is, to put it politely, woefully misinformed. Her manifest ignorance is so egregious that its easy to believe her policy positions like the Green New Deal are parodies of progressivism, and AOL herself is a Republican Manchurian Candidate whose aim is to discredit the Democrats with contemptuous laughter. Her Green New Deal has already been exposed, its violation of the laws not just of economics but of physics, laid bare. Its a preposterous wish-list redolent of commie Woody Guthries Big Rock Candy Mountain, where handouts grow on bushes, just like the Green New Deals promise to pay people unwilling to work. And its equally ignorant of the real-world limits that keep the utopian pie forever in the sky.
Whats more astonishing is that many in her party are climbing on board this preposterous program, mostly the prospective or proclaimed 2020 primary candidates who want to draft off of AOCs celebrity. But that crew is mediocre and politically inept in its own right. Elizabeth Warren is probably mortally wounded by her appropriation of Cherokee identity for careerist advantage, not to mention her trite, parlor pink anti-capitalism and schoolmarmish demeanor. Corey Booker, another POC mascot like AOC, beclowned himself at the Kavanagh inquisition with his bizarre I am Spartacus mangled metaphor, and his desperate pivoting from his earlier more moderate record. Kamala Harris, yet another POC mascot, got her break by being San Francisco mayor Willie Browns squeeze, and the beneficiary of $400,000 in city money he threw her way. She followed that up with a spotty, often incoherent tenure as Californias Attorney General. And dont forget her support for Medicare for All and her desire to eliminate all that, meaning private health insurance.
In short, the sort of candidates that portend a wipeout of 1972 or 1980 proportions. But whats the alternative for Democrats? Their frenzied hatred of Trump and hysterical tantrums have isolated and marginalized any possible blue centrist who could revive a Clintonian Third Way and challenge Trump on terms that appeal to voters outside the base. So too have the Salemite #MeToo hysterics, whose imperative to believe ancient charges of sexual assault, and willingness to suspend Constitutional safeguards for the accused, have alienated millions of voters. And now they are eating their own, like Virginia Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax, a POC accused of two sexual assaults from long ago. So too with the identity-politics Montagnards currently conducting a Thermidor against fellow Democrats like Virginia Governor Ralph Northam for 30-year-old racial offenses.
As for the old white guard, People of Pallor like Bernie Sanders or Joe Biden will have a tough time going up against female POCs. Imagine the primary debates and the eggshells both will have to tread in order to avoid any microaggressions or mansplaining or white privilege airs or inadvertent verbal gaffes detectable only by the commissars of racialist code-talking. Its also likely well hear more accusations of sexual impropriety like the ones about Sanders randy staffers on his 2016 campaign. And groping Joe Biden has a video track record of unseemly massaging of women.
You can forget Starbucks plutocrat Howard Schultz, who compounds the crime of being white and male with the worse crime of being richer than his affluent rivals. It takes a millionaire to really hate a billionaire. And hes already created a lot of bad blood by saying hell run as an independent, which the left sees as a typical flabby liberal cop-out. As Pelosis refusal to negotiate over couch-change for a border barrier shows, the progressives are going to want hair and blood on the walls, not engage in give-and-take.
What promises to be a political Gong Show, then, will be even more entertaining than the current collection of talentless exhibitionists. But that doesnt mean there arent serious stakes at risk in 2020. I remember the Nineties, when I had fun mocking in print the goofy postmodern higher nonsense coming out of the academy. My concern was to defend higher educations traditional mission of training minds in the skills of critical thought and the great traditions of Western civilization. I saw a long-term decline if such trends continued, but I didnt realize the consequences could be so immediate and bloody.
It took the carnage of 9/11 to show the dire effects of hilarious intellectual hijinks. The fashionable self-loathing of postmodern multiculturalism had eroded our capacity to understand clearly the motives of the terrorists and their illiberal, anti-humanist, intolerant religious motives. Postcolonial darling Edward Said may have been a prep-schooled phony and an intellectual fop little known beyond the conventions and seminars of mediocre academics, but his works had poisoned the disciplines like history and Middle Eastern Studies that should have been explaining clearly the nature and motives of the Wests oldest enemy. Instead they were apologists for murderers who despised our freedoms and respect for human rights.
In politics as in academe, absurdity, while amusing, can still be dangerous. A progressive victory in 2020 will mark a revival of the destructive forces unleashed during Obamas two terms. Trump has slowed the assault for now, but we cant let the buffoonery of the Democrats lull us into complacency. The stakes of failure are too high.
Yes they would be truly laughable except for the fact that they now wield political power and even more frightening, they have people who follow them and believe their insanity.
Article has is bass-ackwards. AOC is a REFLECTION of the Democrat Voter Base, not the cause of it. THEY are the Gong Show.
Which is a much bigger problem because if Nancy shoves AOC down 3 flights of Capitol steps today they’ll just glom onto someone equally radical (or more so).
We now have a strong voter base for Socialism in this country. It’s a problem that’s here to stay.
Gene Gene!
The dancing machine ;)
Gene! Gene! The dancing machine!
Sure seems to be a lot of females in that photo.
Poor Gene Gene lost both legs to diabetes later in his life.
That Address is a handy reference for rebutting constitutionally-illiterate Progressives who may call this a "democracy."
Today, in 2018, when confronted with a decision between individual freedom and slavery, otherwise known as liberty and tyranny, Americans who prefer freedom must be armed with ideas and principles which are "self-evident" and plain. Otherwise, they cannot fend off the onslaught of the "counterfeit ideas" of Progressive ideologues.
When America's Founders and Framers of their Constitution wanted to convince ordinary farmers and citizens of the merits of a written "People's" Constitution to limit the powers of those to whom they entrust the powers of government, they published and circulated 85 essays, known as THE FEDERALIST.
It's time for citizens, once again, to examine those strong and clear words of Madison Hamilton, and Jay. They are just as clear for today's audience as they were then. Circulate the following excerpts to your friends. Even the least politically savvy will "get" Madison's meaning, especially in light of the power grab now going on in Washington. After all, THE FEDERALIST was the Framers' authoritative explanation of their Constitution, and directed by the Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia in 1825 to be used as the text for its law school in its studies of "the general principles of liberty and the rights of man," and said by Jefferson to "constitute 'the general opinion of those who framed, and of those who accepted the Constitution of the U.S., on questions as to its genuine meaning.'":
"The house of representatives... can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as the great mass of society. This has always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together. It creates between them that communion of interest, and sympathy of sentiments, of which few governments have furnished examples; but without which every government degenerates into tyranny." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"Such will be the relation between the House of Representatives and their constituents. Duty gratitude, interest, ambition itself, are the cords by which they will be bound to fidelity and sympathy with the great mass of the people." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"If it be asked what is to restrain the House of Representatives from making legal discriminations in favor of themselves and a particular class of the society? I answer, the genius of the whole system, the nature of just and constitutional laws, and above all the vigilant and manly spirit which actuates the people of America, a spirit which nourishes freedom, and in return is nourished by it." - Federalist Papers, No. 57, February 19, 1788
"An elective despotism was not the government we fought for; but one in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among the several bodies of magistracy as that no one could transcend their legal limits without being effectually checked and restrained by the others." - Federalist Papers, No. 58, 1788
"This power over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people, for obtaining a redress of every grievance, and for carrying into effect every just and salutary measure." - Federalist Papers, No. 58, 1788
"The propensity of all single and numerous assemblies (is) to yield to the impulse of sudden and violent passions, and to be seduced by factious leaders into intemperate and pernicious resolutions." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788
"Every new regulation concerning commerce or revenue; or in any manner affecting the value of the different species of property, presents a new harvest to those who watch the change and can trace its consequences; a harvest reared not by themselves but by the toils and cares of the great body of their fellow citizens. This is a state of things in which it may be said with some truth that laws are made for the few not for the many." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788
"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow." - Federalist Papers, No. 62, February 27, 1788
Note particularly the following words of wisdom from Federalist No. 63, and take heart. You are doing what you were meant to do when you speak out on intrusions on your liberty. According to Madison:
"As the cool and deliberate sense of the community ought, in all governments, and actually will, in all free governments, ultimately prevail over the views of its rulers; so there are particular moments in public affairs when the people, stimulated by some irregular passion, or some illicit advantage, or misled by the artful misrepresentations of interested men, may call for measures which they themselves will afterwards be the most ready to lament and condemn. In these critical moments, how salutary will be the interference of some temperate and respectable body of citizens, in order to check the misguided career, and to suspend the blow meditated by the people against themselves, until reason, justice, and truth can regain their authority over the public mind?" - Federalist Papers, No. 63, 1788
Life is cruel sometimes...
Thats why you should dance while you can.
PING!
Give them what they want, but don't let them spread the consequences to all 50 states.
LOL
Hilarious, but way more than true...
This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer.
Will Rogers
Mark Twain
Why Fund Amtrak? Because All Must Serve The Capitol
Acela.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.