Skip to comments.Trump: Democrats 'Now So Extreme That They Don't Mind Executing Babies AFTER Birth'
Posted on 02/26/2019 9:29:50 AM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
We shoulda been burning down their buildings long ago. Now we have this. The end will not be pretty for these MF'ers.
Only Liberals are a special kind of evil that the only people they are capable of feeling empathy for are murderers & rapists.
#3 Yep the celebs will chime in too.
Democrats kill babies, they will have no trouble killing adults who are in their way.
At this point the executive branch would be fully justified in arresting every SOB who voted for this abomination and throwing them all in jail, never to see the light of day again. They’re monsters.
How far we have fallen
Hitler would be proud
I have a 1962 law book. Back then, the moment of conception marked a human life and the baby in the womb had as many rights as a full grown person.
Congratulations demoncrats: you have sanctioned murder.
That site is a great source. I’m amazed that the eunuch Bobby Casey voted on our side, for a change.
Yes...that’s how it all started in Nazi Germany. They began with the weakest members of society. They cleaned out the orphanages and old age homes first. Please read Frederich Wertham’s “Geranium in the Window”. How the Nazis kept the homes for the elderly and abandoned children looking so pretty and traditional, while inside, children and elderly were being starved to death. Then they realized that starvation took too long. With diabolical planning, like the Wansee Conference, they collaborated with doctors, lawyers, professors...to find a quicker way. That is when they hit upon the idea of massive “relocation camps”...the killing fields. Come, get your shower...free cyanide poisoning for all!
Here is a satiric anti-abortion essay I wrote in college in 1977 in response to Roe v. Wade.
The Final Solution to Overpopulation
Of course, abortion is the best form of birth control. Condoms break, you can forget to take the pill, and IUDs can pierce a womans uterus and scar and injure her. Spermicidal jellies and foams are messy and not likely to be used. Tubule ligation and vasectomies work only for those who are willing to make such a commitment, as does abstinence. Pregnancies caused by birth control mistakes are proverbial in our culture. The surest solution to the worlds greatest problem, that of overpopulation, is abortion. It is safe when done early in pregnancy, and 100% certain to eliminate an unwanted pregnancy. However, abortion doesnt go far enough in reducing population growth, and in reducing population itself.
The worlds population has increased nearly three billion since the landmark Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade in 1973. World population under the best estimates will stabilize at eleven billion after 2050. The worlds ecosystem is already severely stressed with the six billion people on the earth. More needs to be done to reduce population. What is the next step?
Roe v. Wade determined the first 23 weeks of pregnancy are eligible for abortion since the fetus is not yet viable. More recent court rulings have permitted abortions through the last trimester of pregnancy for the health of the mother, mental and physical. Using the principle of viability and the principle of what is best for the mental and physical health of humanity, the next logical step is to permit post natal abortions (PNAs) on non-viable post natal fetuses (PNFs).
Although the majority of PNFs are wanted, not a single PNF is viable. It cannot survive without an adult caregiver. Further, they are a mental and physical burden upon the caregiver and should not be permitted to live without the full and willing desire of the caregiver. Why should PNFs be permitted to burden our sorely taxed ecosystem by allowing unwanted ones to grow to full maturity? Is it not kinder, gentler, and more humane to safely terminate them should the caregiver find them a burden? Is not the caregiver fully within their privacy rights to manage this life form within their own home as they see fit?
There need be no moral qualms about this policy whatsoever. Our society has already established the legal morality of abortion up through the end of the third trimester. What difference should the simple process of parturition make to morality of removing a non-viable life form from a possibly miserable existence? Just as abortion removes the burden of an unwanted fetus from society, so a PNA can terminate the mental and physical burden of an undesired PNF. A simple injection of potassium cyanide or a pill of the same can quickly and painlessly remove this ecological disaster waiting to happen.
The benefits of PNAs cannot be exaggerated. They are safer than abortions in the third trimester. They alleviate a financial burden on the family and society in general, reserving resources for those individuals chosen to enter the human family. With a worldwide policy of PNAs, all individuals will be wanted. Without undesired PNFs, the negative influence of humanity upon the earth will decrease, not increase. Air and water pollution will begin to decrease. The welfare rolls will decrease, reducing the tax burden.
Yet, even a vigorous, worldwide program of PNAs, administrated under the auspices of the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) does not go far enough. There are millions and billions of individuals worldwide who are no longer viable. Although they were human at one time, they are no longer self-supporting. Many can no longer communicate and are not conscious. They are all draining societys resources and all require care of some other human being. Using the same moral principle as Roe v. Wade and other pro-abortion rulings, we may safely and ethically consider such entities as post human lives (PHLs). In view of human induced global warming and the possible worldwide catastrophe that is pending, is it not nobler to remove these life forms from existence than to permit them to continue to consume the worlds limited resources? Such an act of mercy would spare the functioning, productive humanity this unwanted burden, and more importantly, would reduce the space pressures humanity puts on endangered species worldwide. Concurrent with a program of PNAs there must be a worldwide program of post human abortions (PHAs).
As good as PNAs would be, PHAs would be even better. PHLs consume far more resources than PNFs. All the benefits enumerated for PNAs would be multiply true for PHAs. Society would become free of all individuals who are not productive. Taxes could be reduced, or the freed up funds could go toward art, literature, and good public works. Cares and worries of old age would be a thing of the past. Once a person becomes a burden to anyone, they are simply considered a PHL and given a gentle PHA. The social security trust fund will become adequate and even generous, with a reduced future burden upon working humanity.
PNAs and PHLs have benefits even beyond these. They will give birth to a new age of medical research. There will be an unlimited supply of organs and stem cells for the benefit of human population. Very likely, the human lifetime will be considerably extended. This will create additional population pressure, so PNAs and PHAs need to be executed and enforced ubiquitously.
How is a sweeping, worldwide program of PNAs and PHAs best to be administrated and implemented? It should start with the UN. As part of UN membership, every country should have laws that require every caregiver to sign a certificate of humanity to their offspring or to any non-viable entity in their care. At a minimum, these certificates should be renewed annually, like drivers licenses. Each country may add additional requirements for their definition of viable humanity. This allows each country to retain its own sovereignty and cultural distinctiveness. By entrusting such a critical definition to each federal government, we can be sure the same care and wisdom shown in governmental taxing and welfare programs will be applied toward this critical program of PNAs and PHAs.
It is expected that some countries will put political requirements into their definition of humanity, some will put religious requirements, some physical requirements, such as a certain height, weight, body build, or skin color. Aside from promoting cultural diversity, this mosaic of laws will catch PHLs who travel from one country to another and further reduce world population. The varied laws will also purify the human gene pool, catching the ignorant and unwary, classifying them as PHLs and terminating them, protecting mother Earth from the corrosive effects of their former human existence.
Even such a beneficial program will surely have opposition. Religious extremists and radical anarchists are likely to resist blessing mankind with a healthier, less intrusive life upon this earth. A simple and effective method of dealing with such evil-minded beings is to classify them as PHLs and perform PHAs upon them. This action will quickly bring about worldwide consensus for this uniquely effective approach to population control.
With unwanted PNFs eliminated through PNAs, with burdensome PHLs removed through PHAs, with humanitys genetic lines improved through the forced evolutionary selection of diverse laws worldwide, a new age will dawn. No longer will pollution wreck our planets rivers, lakes, and oceans. No longer will smog dominate cities. No longer will teeming millions suffer and starve. No longer will species die out through human encroachment upon their habitats. With the moral principles put forth in Roe v. Wade, logically extended and applied, humanity will joyfully march forward into a brave, new world.
Please read Frederich Werthams Geranium in the Window. How the Nazis kept the homes for the elderly and abandoned children looking so pretty and traditional, while inside, children and elderly were being starved to death.
Thank you for this reference.
You are welcome! The book is “A Sign for Cain”...”Geranium” is one chapter. Another must-read is “Berlin Diary” by Christopher Isherwood. He was an American reporter in Germany when the Nazis were coming into power. He noticed a marked increase in the Obituaries of older Germans out in the country towns. No one could figure out the unusual increase in deaths of apparently healthy seniors. He alone investigated. It is a fascinating read.
Thanks so much
Patty Murray is a dumb, lost, leftist hack of a human. She and her ilk are proud arrogant ghouls of delusional values. Innocent baby blood will be accounted against such as her kind.
Looks like “just a mom in tennis shoes” got hit in the head with one of them.
These books opened my eyes, many years ago. Being part German, it was hard for me to read these facts. Back when journalism was honest and true.I could hardly believe that such a cultured people could be so barbaric. And now I see it happening here, in my own beloved country. If we do not learn from the past...we shall repeat the past.
That is my exact question. How the hell would this hurt women, babies, or doctors?
- How does it hurt a woman when her unwanted baby ends up alive? So what? People dont want their spouses sometimes but we frown on them killing them.
- how does it hurt a baby to be allowed to live? To be allowed to have breath and warmth and love? Death doesnt hurt, but life does? What philosopher every came to that conclusion?
- How does it hurt a doctor to save a newborn babys life? If we look at the crass bottom line, he now has two patients to cash in on!
Yeah I hear how they were once at least sane, blah blah...
But this is where IT HAD TO LEAD.
They were always “progressive”. This is where progressive leads.
Kennedy may have been hard right compared to these nuts but I watched the debate on youtube between Nixon and him last year (born in ‘68).
He sounded like a liberal.
It’s just about the sickest thing i’ve EVER heard.
Sounds like something hitler would have said and he would have been rightly reviled for it.
Guess it depends on who’s saying it
Democrats dont like botched assassinations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.