This ruling is BS.
It wasnt his fun. He didnt buy it. It was his mothers that she bought, used and stored properly.
He stole it and shot her.
There is NOTHING, in any way shape or form, that makes this company or its adevertising liable for this.
The deranged punk didn’t go out and buy this weapon. So how is Remington “guilty” of marketing this weapon to young people?
Lanza killed his mother after stealing HER weapon.
I hope Remington appeals to a higher court.
Will breweries, wineries and distilleries now be sued for drunk driving crashes?
Article and # 9, other comments.