Why should names be released?
A - to fight the narrative that he was a “right winger”. He said he was a former Communist and former anarchist, then “libetarian” (does that Party even exist outside the US?), and is now an eco-fascist. Do the background research on the man’s prior organizational ties.
B - We were told the Olympic park bomber was “no doubt” the guy who alerted security to the threat. Only it wasn’t. If people are going to be scooped up and blamed for a crime, the names need to be released. Otherwise we risk becoming a land where people just disappear from the street never to be seen again, with no mention as to why, too bad to mention.
And as I stated, his guilt is only in question among those who argue that “innocence by reason of (temporary) insanity” is a “thing”.
“Why should names be released?
A - to fight the narrative that he was a “right winger”.”
I was referencing this one case.
His name is completely meaningless. Proclaim his political leanings, but refer to him as the killer. All that is necessary.
We have all heard about copy cat murders by degenerates wanting to be “famous” and their names known.
Bravo. Amazing that you have to remind folks of this on s site populated by dedicated anti-communists. How soon they forget.
The mechanisms of tyranny have endured through the ages.