If you manufacture evidence in order to frame someone of a crime he didn’t commit, couldn’t that be described as maybe a little illegal? Especially if you’re trying to frame the freaking President Of The United States?
It’s only illegal if you are a republican.
I think the vernacular would be ‘trying to freaking frame the
president’
Malicious prosecution is one term for such a travesty. Now he can open up the floodgate.
Wonder if the Russians were involved? Seriously. Weren’t the Russians involved with Steele?
We would like to know what set in motion this massive effort by the Obama Administration, the Hillary campaign and the DNC to target Donald Trump and prevent him from becoming President. After the election we would like to know why Democrats and John McCain, David Kramer, the FBI, the Justice Department and others conspired to overturn the vote of the people. Let’s look at this.
The Muller report states that no American worked with Russia.However we know that Hillary and the DNC through their lawyer Marc Elias hired Glenn Simpson who hired former British spy Christopher Steele . Weren’t some of the dossier’s authors working with Russia to get dirt on Donald Trump? This should make a lively and through investigation.
The problem with the probe is it will eventually lead back to the Clinton/ 0bama machine and we just cannot have that
POTUS: “This was an illegal takedown that failed and hopefully somebody is going to be looking at the other side.”
TITLE OF ARTICLE: “Trump team turns tables after Mueller report, calls for investigation into probe’s origin.”
Come on... what the president actually said and what the title of the article actually says does not align Koat all.
POTUS: “This was an illegal takedown that failed and hopefully somebody is going to be looking at the other side.”
TITLE OF ARTICLE: “Trump team turns tables after Mueller report, calls for investigation into probe’s origin.”
Come on... what the president actually said and what the title of the article actually says does not align at all.