Skip to comments.Bret Easton Ellis: ‘I Want an Apology’ from My Friends Who Pushed Mueller Hysteria
Posted on 04/09/2019 10:22:41 AM PDT by listenhillary
There is no way to get around the fact that the mainstream media misled the country for the last two years. Period, Bret Easton Ellis said, according to The Wrap. Im not saying that as a conservative, or as a liberal. Im saying it simply as a witness. The 55-year-old author also ripped into the left for mass psychosis and said he wanted an apology from his friends who perpetuated Trump-Russia conspiracies.
From every one of my friends or acquaintances or anyone I encountered on social media or watched blather away on TV for the last two years who insisted that the Mueller report was definitely going to implicate Trump in collusion with Russia, and will determine that the Russians stole the 2016 election away from Hillary Clinton and our whole national nightmare will finally be over, because the Mueller report will implicate Trump and he will be impeached. I want an apology, he said, adding, But Im not going to get an apology. Because yall is f*cking crazy.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It's actually all y'all ...
How much insanity and instigated violence are they responsible for?
Just business as usual? Well...
If the bartender and bar owner can be charged for what a drunk driver does after drinking at their bar, then what about the MSM and their owners for what they have intentionally(!) done to we, the victims, of their purposeful insanity that often ended with violence?
Reparations for the MSM enslaved and those who love them and lived through their MSM-induced madness!
Let the games begin
Unfortunately theyre still pushing it.
But Im not going to get an apology. Because yall is f*cking crazy.
Conventional wisdom is that the unanimous (enthusiastically so) 1964 New York Times v. Sullivan SCOTUS decision is precedent preventing public figures from suing for libel.
IMHO that is a bad precedent; the facts before SCOTUS were too simple by half:
The Republican-nominated majority now sitting on SCOTUS have good reason to know that the MSM is a liberal nightmare.
- Plaintiff Sullivan was neither a Republican nor a Democrat in good standing; he was a southern Democrat - a breed which was in bad odor with SCOTUS by then.
- the MSM already was a monopoly which promoted the conceit that journalism - which is self-consciously focused on bad news - is objective. The fact that that was and is sheer self-serving propaganda was not before the Court.
- the fact that Republicans are libeled routinely but "liberal" Democrats do not get libeled at all was not before the Court.
- In 1964 the famously liberal Warren Court was sitting.
In my observations and experience, they have been intentionally intoxicatingly influencing the thoughts, emotions and behaviors of those who watch their ... programming, so to speak.
Look into brain physiology and the psychology they use to influence emotions and the intended behaviours of those operating under the influence of those emotions.
Fascinating, well-established science and its kind of scary how easily manipulated humans can be.
So... Why are they not as responsible for whatever damages, pain and suffering, even death, that might occur as a result of their business practices, just the same as a bartender and bar owner share the responsibility for serving that one or few drinks too many to the drunk driver who then totaled his/her car and killed a family?
Hey, they want run this game on gun manufacturers, right?
Lets see how they and their checkbooks look in that same mirror, hmmm?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.