Skip to comments.New study refutes climate-change alarm
Posted on 04/12/2019 8:11:14 AM PDT by rktman
Scientists who promote the theory of anthropogenic climate change contend a rise in the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere due to human activity is causing catastrophic warming.
But a new scientific study finds that the current CO2 levels of 410 parts per million were last seen on Earth 3 million years ago, points out Breitbart Editor-at-Large John Nolte.
Researchers at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research published their findings in the journal Science Advances.
The study also found that during this time of global warming, long before the Industrial Age, there were no ice sheets covering either Greenland or West Antarctica, and much of the East Antarctic ice sheet was gone.
And, the researchers concluded, temperatures were up to 7 degrees Fahrenheit warmer globally and sea levels were 65 feet higher.
Nolte noted that the far-left ThinkProgress, while sticking with the (global warming) hoax, makes a significant concession.
The good news is that the Earth does not warm instantly, and mile-thick ice sheets melt even more slowly, ThinkProgress concludes. So the temperature rise will take several decades, and tens of feet of sea level rise will take hundreds and hundreds of years.
But ThinkProgress still insists the choices we make now can affect the rate of rise and determine whether we blow past 65 feet of sea level rise to beyond 200 feet.
Even worse ThinkProgress continues, the climate policy agenda President Donald Trump is pushing actions that include rolling back U.S. laws that reduce carbon pollution and abandoning the Paris climate agreement would lock us in to such high CO2 levels, sea levels would rise a foot per decade in just a few decades.
Nolte doesnt buy it.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the suns planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
Are you claiming the atmosphere has no impact on climate?
Adapt, adapt, adapt is the life lesson all life on earth has learned, for eons. Where in the hell do the evolutionists explain all new species came from. They admit their theory says it was from adaptation. And if so, then what drove the adaptation, a static unchanging earth and a static unchanging earth climate??
Yet today we find that humans are at a point of technological progress where we are positioned better than we have ever been before in all history to adapt to, and mitigate the effects of, a changing earth.
We can either invest in adapting for and mitigating the effects of earth changes or throw away more than a century of time and trillions of dollars chasing CO2, only to find it a waste of time, either because that could not mitigate CO2 accumulation fast enough, or that it was unnecessary to begin with. Why wait to find out. Adapt.
Climate change occurs regardless of mankind. But there are men and women who want to control the masses. With a complicit media helping the “rulers” and a gooberment paying the “scientists” for their analysis supporting the climate change agenda of the “rulers” the collusion of their efforts is too damned obvious. Thank God for President Donald J. Trump. MAGA!!
Hey now! You musta forgot weir two stoopid to recogise them kinda things.
MAGA!! Make Alexandria(oc) Go Away?
I’m claiming man has no impact on climate.
“Scientists who promote the theory of anthropogenic climate change contend a rise in the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere due to human activity is causing catastrophic warming.”
Quoit? (What in French)
(chiefly of environmental pollution and pollutants) originating in human activity.
CO2 is NOT a POLLUTANT, Just like Oxygen is not a pollutant, water is not a pollutant.
By the way... “Water vapor and clouds account for 66 to 85 percent of the greenhouse effect, compared to a range of 9 to 26 percent for CO2.”
BAN WATER! BAN CLOUDS!
(I kinda like clouds, do we have to?) /s
“...Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?...”
*** TAX SUN USAGE ***
Read “The Neglected Sun: Why the Sun Precludes Climate Catastrophe”.
What would be the volume of water of the water needed to raise the oceans by 12 inches? Huge! What volume of ice and what volume of snow would need to melt to produce that volume of water?
The oceans cover 70% of the Earth’s surface, and land the remaining 30%. Water expands when it becomes ice. Snow’s density varies, so it’s hard to calculate the required volume. But there must be someone out there who can do the numbers!
They’re really not much different than prophets and priests of centuries ago who demanded indulgences and money under the threat of stopping the Sun God from driving his firey chariot across the sky every day.
Tying actions of man to immutable events of nature is simply a logical fallacy, but no one has the brains or guts to say so.
Awesome graphic Frank!
By taxing it of course!
the magic word: PAYING
They don't but they do control people's minds with the help of government schools and the brain rot of the media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.