Posted on 05/22/2019 10:20:46 AM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
If the Dems disenfranchise GOP voters we have two countries and break up the union, which is what the dems want because they hate America.
The Constitution now says whatever the hell any 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices want it to say at any point in time.
The SCOTUS needs to knock down this nonsense ASAP. States don’t get to make changes to the Constitution of their own volition.
I just hope that President Trump is able to replace Ginsburg and/or Breyer (the two octogenarian far left liberals) before the issue reaches the Supreme Court.
If Trump won the popular vote but lost Nevada and was just 8EV shy of the 270 needed to clinch, this would be poetic justice. In fact, I’d dearly wish that such a scenario happens.
Democrats managed to flip 7 House seats in California days after the election using “Vote Harvesting”, which is illegal in many states and ought to be illegal in all of them.
The Trump administration needs to institute a modern election system employing voter ID, the same as Mexico has had for years now.
All it would take is for a conservative Republican to carry Texas by a few million extra votes (like Clinton did in California) but lose the electoral college by a few votes for democrats to suddenly decide that the electoral college is vital to our Republic.
How exactly do they plan to reach 270 by next year?
Which states get them to 270?
If they can get to 270 , then a Democrat will already win those sames states the Constitutional way.
JUst calm down.
they cannot reach 270 y next year too many state legislatures needed to hit 270.
All those states under 10 EVS are not ready by next Summer.
Is it? I'd like to see proof. Quite the contrary, I believe. I was once of that belief, and then I read the Constitution regarding state's rights in this. Unfortunately, HOW the electoral votes are distributed are up to the states. All that matters is that they are using the EC. HOW they use it is up to them.
The index finger on my right hand has a terrible itch.
Maybe good for 2020, maybe not so much down the road.
If the electoral system is destroyed then the reason
for less populous states to support the Constitution
goes away. It was that caveat which made the
Constitution palpable to the small states. Take it
away and those states could rightfully secede in
my book.
Don't care? Hell, that is their intent!
This seems so obviously to disenfranchise a state’s voters. How can that be constitutional?
Does this mean a Federal Voter ID will be implemented since these Traitorous State Legislatures are colluding with each other?
I recall the Southern States agreed to collude back in the 1860’s.
The Constitution is clear and an analysis has been posted ad nauseum on FR.
You challenge it, so you post the applicable portions of the Constitution and provide your analysis.
Start here to make it easy for you,
https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2012/02/william-ross-vote-compact/
Very good point. But, if states choose to bend that way
I think it would change the status of the electoral system
enough to stir the SCOTUS to action. Then who knows?
Nevada might have been better off to write the law
in a way that allows their legislators to treat the
matter on a election to election basis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.