Posted on 07/17/2019 5:44:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
Recording events from public land shouldn't be a crime.
Yet when a woman in Utah, standing by a public road, filmed farmworkers pushing a cow with a bulldozer, the farmer drove up to her and said, "You cannot videotape my property."
Soon the police came and local prosecutors charged her with "agricultural operation interference."
They dropped the charges several months later since she was on public land.
But what if she'd posed as a farmworker, got a job on the farm and then secretly recorded what she saw?
Increasingly, activists do that. More than a hundred such undercover investigations have been done.
They then distribute video that sometimes shows animals being cruelly abused. In my video this week, we see calves being hit, kicked and thrown.
Farmers, upset about such recordings, are now asking politicians to outlaw them, and several state legislatures have obliged. They've passed "ag-gag" laws bans on sneaking onto farms to secretly record what they see.
Kay Johnson Smith of the Animal Agriculture Alliance supports such laws, though she doesn't use the term "ag-gag."
"We call it 'farm protection,'" she told me. "Activists stalk farms to try to capture something that the public doesn't understand. The agricultural community is the only business where this sort of tactic is really being used."
Smith says the activists' real agenda is not just preventing cruelty to animals: "These activist groups want to eliminate all of animal agriculture."
I believe her. Many activists are animal rights extremists.
But I also worry that laws like ag-gag rules will stop people from revealing abuses. I'm an investigative reporter. I can't do my job well if laws prevent me from showing the abuse. Audiences often won't believe what I report if they can't see it for themselves.
Videos made by the group Mercy for Animals have led to criminal charges. Some of their investigations led Walmart to create new purchasing policies.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund claims ag-gag laws violate the First Amendment. They've succeeded in getting several states' ag-gag laws struck down.
When Iowa's law was ruled unconstitutional, legislators simply replaced it with a narrower law that forbids activists to lie to get access to farms.
The activists argue that because farms lie about their practices, the only way to reveal the truth is to lie to get onto farms.
Activists simply "want to ensure that the American public knows how these foods are processed, what happens to animals," says Animal Legal Defense Fund lawyer Amanda Howell.
"You've got tens of thousands of animals in warehouses standing on concrete floors never seeing the light of day. ... If that affects people's purchasing decisions, then there's a reason for it," says Howell.
"They want to make their movie ... their sensational video," retorts Smith. "If they really cared about animals, they would stop it right then! Instead, they go weeks and months without reporting anything to the farm owners."
That's often true.
Activists say long-term investigations are necessary because otherwise "a company can say this is a one-off," says Howell. Long-term investigations "show that's something that happens every day."
I took that argument to Smith.
"What they really want is to stop people from eating meat, milk and eggs," she said. "There are bad apples in every industry, (but) 99.9% of farmers in America, they do the right thing every single day. Farming isn't always pretty."
I asked Howell if she and her group do want to end all consumption of meat and eggs. It's funny watching her response on the video. She never gives a straight answer.
But her evasions bother me less than corporations using politicians to censor their critics.
Whatever you think of the activists -- and I have problems with many of them -- government shouldn't pass special laws that prevent people from revealing what's true.
“You’ve got tens of thousands of animals in warehouses standing on concrete floors never seeing the light of day.
That could be. LOL
>>”We call it ‘farm protection,’” she told me. “Activists stalk farms to try to capture something that the public doesn’t understand. The agricultural community is the only business where this sort of tactic is really being used.”
Meanwhile activist DAs and judges will make up charges to prosecute those who expose fraud, coverup, and a litany of crimes at Planned Parenthood on video.
. There are most likely layers of straw on top of the floors on which the animals stand.
Now days the concrete is cleaner for disease control and they live in heated buildings.
These people will bitch if the sky is blue. Their only purpose is to complain with their mouths full.
I can’t do my job well if laws prevent me from showing the abuse. Audiences often won’t believe what I report if they can’t see it for themselves.
Its called trespassing Mr. Stossel. Filming from a public road is perfectly legal. Entering private property under false pretenses is not.
L
Just a thought, but some of this “activism” could be a ruse to attempt to remove the most digestible and accessible sources of protein from our diet. “Here, have another soy burger. It kind of looks like meat.” They weaken us, and we are easier to take over. Eating steak is the leading cause of white supremacy and climate change. Veganism Now!
(That last bit was sarcasm)
Soy burger? blech, the thought of it makes me want to gag.
“Pushing a cow with a bulldozer”...akin to shooting an elephant in my pajamas!
Videos made by the group Mercy for Animals have led to criminal charges. Some of their investigations led Walmart to create new purchasing policies.
Any word on animal welfare out of China?
I doubt it is a pretty picture.
My concern in this story are the cops who went after someone whose actions were 100% legal and then they falsely charged her with interfering with the farm. These jerks should be fired ASAP but as usual nothing will happen to them.
Filming abortionists selling baby parts is the same. Got to let them do what they do for our own good. Jail the messengers!
Maybe farmer should be able to trust public schooled jurrors to use common sense and thus legal weasels would know they have to case...but that’s craziness. Let the schools keep decaying...add laws to paper over the ramifications. Hitler!
Filming child mal-treatment inside a day-care needs to be protected from these menacing kids - said the Scooby Doo team.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.