Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww
The court's decision could serve as a setback for Democratic lawmakers should Trump not be forced to prove he hasn't violated the Constitution's anti-corruption clauses, which limit a federal official's ability to accept gifts

Sure sounds like the Demrats are trying to "get" Trump by demanding he prove a negative. It's the same tactic they tried with the Russian collusion sham! They never seem to remember that over 62 MILLION voters put Trump in power. It will not go well for them if they presume we would desert him so easily.

7 posted on 07/19/2019 11:57:39 PM PDT by boatbums (semper reformanda secundum verbum dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: boatbums

Actually, the court accepted PDJT’s argument that allowing discovery to go forward before the issue of separation of powers is decided is violation of his right to due process. Once the discovery starts, and the records are turned over to the congress committees, there is no way to undo it. The records will be copied, leaked to the MSM and misrepresented.


8 posted on 07/20/2019 12:53:46 AM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson