Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump: UK is losing the 'anchor round its ankle'
bbc ^ | 26 August 2019 | bbc

Posted on 08/27/2019 12:29:59 AM PDT by Cronos

...Mr Johnson said the US must open up its markets if a post-Brexit trade deal is to be agreed.

"I don't think we sell a single joint of British lamb in the UnitedStates, we don't sell any beef,"

....Johnson told Trump: "Talking of the anchor, Donald, what we want is for our ships to take freight, say, from New York to Boston, which for the moment they're not able to do."

Johnson said agreeing any trade deals with the US within ayear "would be tight".

"My own experience of the way Americans work, the size and complexity of the deal we want to do probably means we won't be able to do within a year.

...Offering an example of American trade restriction: "Melton Mowbray pork pies, which are sold in Thailand and in Iceland, are currently unable to enter the US market because of, I don't know, some sort of food and drug administration restriction."

"UK bell peppers cannot get into the US market at all.

"Wine shipments are heavily restricted. If you want to export wine made in England to the US you have to go through a US distributor.

"There is a tax on British micro-breweries in the US that doesn't apply to US micro-breweries in the UK."

The government added that tariffs on some UK goods in the US can reach up to 28% for fashion, 15% for machinery and 35% for food and drink.

... the US "would be loathe" to get rid of the barriers intended to protect US producers.

"The US is quite protectionist - the US have never done a trade deal the likes of which Mr Johnson is describing.

"The question is whether the US is prepared to give the UK something and what we would have to give them in return.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: borisjohnson; brexit; brexitparty; europeanunion; iceland; meltonmowbray; nato; nigelfarage; thailand; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Mr Johnson said agreeing any trade deals with the US within a year "would be tight".
1 posted on 08/27/2019 12:29:59 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: central_va; SteveH; FLT-bird; dp0622

as I have said over and over again - a trade deal will take time, it won’t happen overnight.

And, as I kept saying there WILL be objections and disputes over the details and many posters called this project fear.

Well, here you go - it ain’t fear, it’s fact. There will be discussions and the final trade deal will take time before being signed.


2 posted on 08/27/2019 12:31:58 AM PDT by Cronos (Re-elect President Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Well, they never should have set fire to the White House back in the day. ;-)


3 posted on 08/27/2019 12:40:47 AM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

lol

The Chinese never got near our White House :)

Amazing how over time enemies become allies and allies become enemies and France remains both.


4 posted on 08/27/2019 1:17:43 AM PDT by dp0622 (Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

The US and U.K. can strike a temporary trade deal - day two years in duration while negotiating for a permanent deal. That’s exactly what Trump has proposed.


5 posted on 08/27/2019 1:31:47 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

hmmm... can you explain how this “temporary trade deal” would work? I have no idea how this is possible - doesn’t ia trade deal need to go through parliament and Congress?


6 posted on 08/27/2019 1:33:57 AM PDT by Cronos (Re-elect President Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

What is also interesting about China under Xi is the unnecessary hubris.

If China had been following the Deng strategy of quietly growing and not making too much noise, all would be well.

They didn’t need to grab the south China sea so overtly.
They didn’t need to stir trouble with the Doklam issue.
They didn’t need to re-arm themselves so much.

Imagine if they had quietly kept growing, not drawing too much non-economic attention to themselves. Then by 2030 they would be unstoppable.

I wonder why Xi acted this way. Is it his personal issue? Or is it a China structural issue that caused them to draw attention to themselves?


7 posted on 08/27/2019 1:37:10 AM PDT by Cronos (Re-elect President Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Are those trade deals made independently of the EU? If the EU had a hand in them, then Boris can go bugger off.


8 posted on 08/27/2019 1:43:12 AM PDT by wastedyears ( left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears; FLT-bird; JudgemAll; usconservative; canuck_conservative; PapaBear3625

post-Brexit deal implies that this is only the UK and not the other 27 countries + the UK dealing with the USA.

What Boris is talking about is that he wants a US-UK trade deal where
1. the UK can sell British (Welsh to be specific) lamb to the USA
2. the UK can sell beef to the USA
3. the UK can sell pork pies to the USA
4. the UK can sell bell peppers
5. the USA removes restrictions on British wine (I understand the English grow a little wine now - never tried it)
6. the USA removes tariffs on UK goods (28% on fashion, 15% on machinery and 35% for food)

nearly all of the above items seem agriculture related, so American farmers may not want to allow free flow of British agricultural products.

And definitely British farmers will want protection from American products which, with economies of scale, can be cheaper.


9 posted on 08/27/2019 2:12:02 AM PDT by Cronos (Re-elect President Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

“Amazing how over time enemies become allies and allies become enemies and France remains both.”
*

The French are whores. Always have been, always will be....


10 posted on 08/27/2019 2:57:54 AM PDT by snoringbear (,W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
The only way (as I see it ...) that a trade deal works between the US and UK is a drop of all tariff's between the two countries. It would certainly benefit the UK as replacement good from the US would flow into the UK for those goods the UK loses as a result of BREXIT due to not enough time to negotiate trade deals with the EU.

I'd see it as a win-win, though I'm no economist and I don't know all the in's and out's of the state of the British economy specific to the items and protections listed in the article.

Disclaimer: as always, I reserve the right to be wrong and sometimes I am. Just ask my GF.

11 posted on 08/27/2019 3:30:40 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear
The French are whores. Always have been, always will be....

And cowards.

12 posted on 08/27/2019 3:31:39 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Thatcher would devastate the British economy. For agricultural and manufacturing sectors it cannot compete in terms of economies of scale. For services it can compete and offers similar products to wall street.


13 posted on 08/27/2019 4:17:28 AM PDT by Cronos (Re-elect President Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: usconservative; snoringbear

While I dislike the French as well, those characterizations aren’t true.

Their aid is what pushed the American revolution in favour of the colonialists.

And they distinguished themselves in battle in world war one where most of the bloody battles were fought on French territory.

Their fault is linked to the French revolution when they destroyed their culture, and gave up their leading nation role. They elevated nationalism to replace religion and that is their cardinal fault


14 posted on 08/27/2019 4:21:28 AM PDT by Cronos (Re-elect President Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Thank you for the education. (Sincerely...)


15 posted on 08/27/2019 4:23:41 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I’d enjoy some of their lamb, please!


16 posted on 08/27/2019 4:26:11 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Still shilling for the EU, I see! They must pay you overtime.


17 posted on 08/27/2019 4:27:51 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Weren’t the restrictions on their beef imposed due to mad cow disease?

Also I remember a scandal in Britain a few years ago when ready made products were found to contain horsemeat instead of beef or pork.


18 posted on 08/27/2019 4:30:10 AM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

[What is also interesting about China under Xi is the unnecessary hubris.]


Not at all. Xi won’t live forever. Under Mao, the Party stood up. Under Deng, the Party’s economy stood up. Under Xi, China will do whatever it wants. That’s the theory, anyway. No ambitious Chinese ruler has ever left the glory-seeking to his successors, especially given, in Xi’s case, the lack of a likely hereditary successor. Xi is pushing 70. He doesn’t have that many years left to work his will.


19 posted on 08/27/2019 4:32:10 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Looks like the pork pies might have been brought up by Boris to pre-empt their squealing they were losing the protectionism they had with the EU:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/aug/26/telling-porkies-boris-johnson-melton-mowbray-pork-pie-claim-fails-truth-test


20 posted on 08/27/2019 4:34:11 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson