Remember when the main stream media was claiming the high ground over internet bloggers because they had editors and fact checkers?
Here we have a story that is 40 years old. A friend of someone recalls an event that happened at a party 40 years ago and the New York Times prints it as fact!
Within seconds the Democrats got on their trusty high horse and demand an impeachment of a justice based on ... well nothing more than an allegation that can neither be proved or disproved.
The New York Times should do some research on the old folk tale of THE BOY THAT CRIED WOLF.
With each of these types of stories their credibility inches lower. How low can it go, well how deep can they keep digging that hole they are in?
Losers like Gillibrand jumping on this lie should also be held accountable.