Posted on 09/17/2019 10:53:58 PM PDT by hsmomx3
Progressive Democrats’ frustration with the new senior Senator from Arizona are spilling into the party’s annual state meeting.
The Progressives are demanding Senator Kyrsten Sinema from Arizona to “support the tenets of the 2016 Democratic party platform” and now want to formally censure her at the state committee meeting this weekend, according to a resolution obtained by ABC15.
This same group further wants the state party to communicate this to the Democratic National Committee and Arizona’s elected Democratic officials.
(Excerpt) Read more at abc15.com ...
hotter than jeff flake, and pisses off the dnc instead of republicans?
I’ll take it.
The DemocRATS can’t stand the least bit of independent thinking. My bet is that if they try to push Sinema too far she’ll simplify tell them to go screw themselves. And THAT would be grand!
I did appreciate her quirky style...
Maybe she’s a DINO?
Funny how that “Reaching across the isle” is a one-way street for “liberal” socialist/communist!
oh my. This should be the strategy of conservatives in swing-blue states moving forward! PRETEND to be a lib!
Amen to that. Of course, this story prompts two obvious questions:
1.) This progressive group opposing Sinema — what share of the AZ RATs do they actually represent?
2.) More to the point, how much clout do they have?
This site, on the surface, doesn’t tell me much:
https://chapters.pdamerica.org/home/arizona/
The Dems cheated to get her in, the least she could do is march in goosestep with their platform. No independent thinking for you!
But..but... BUT Sen Sinema is an open LESBIAN. How dare she think for herself!
How dare Sinema represent the wishes of the people of Arizona and not the corrupt vile democrat extreme commie left party platform of mentally deficient immature weasels!!
Why I never...
:-) /s
“hotter than jeff flake, and pisses off the dnc instead of republicans? I’ll take it.”
I hear you, but keep in mind that she still likely* would have voted against Kavenaugh, will RINO-Supreme Flake still voted for him.
*I don’t think she was in the Senate at that time, and all other Democrats opposed Kavenaugh.
Somebody get her a red pill...stat!
Yes, of course she would have voted against Judge K. However, she has voted for a majority of the Trump judges . . . but not all as Martha McSally has.
Enema is a VERY smart pol, one of the smartest I’ve ever seen in AZ politics. She will easily win reelection, as she is being viewed as a DemoKKKrat McTurd, rightly or wrongly.
She will vote with us on every insignificant vote and every “style over substance” vote, and against us on every genuine “change” vote.
Just another reason that many people are leaving the democratic party, because of it stupidity and threatening of their own.
Stalinists gotta purge.
I thought it was a disaster when she was elected in light of some of her comments.
I’ve been shocked at how independent and often balanced Sienna has been. There’s plenty I disagree with her about but she’s not a screeching lunatic you can’t even talk to or reason with about every issue like many of today’s Donkeys are.
“Pretend to be a lib...”
Oh my! I’d have to have a strong stomach. Would I be a good candidate if I were gritting my teeth, holding my nose and swallowing hard whenever I spoke their drivel?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.