To: backwoods-engineer
"California is in a state of insurrection against the Constitution."
This new requirement to be President and their Sanctuary Laws are absolutely contrary to the Constitution. Pres. Trump is fighting back. Remember back when AZ law tried to enforce border security and was shot down by the USSC? They said it wasn't a State's right to enforce such, it was a Fedgov obligation. I agreed with the finding, even though being a States' Rights advocate. I follow the Constitution first!
22 posted on
09/20/2019 3:39:32 PM PDT by
A Navy Vet
(I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Also LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
To: A Navy Vet
And now they’re claiming states’ rights to defy federal law! Where are the judges on that?
25 posted on
09/21/2019 4:44:42 PM PDT by
Eleutheria5
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: A Navy Vet
Every governor, every elected state official, every appointed law officer and public servant at the state level swears or affirms that they will uphold their state constitution and laws duly enacted AND the federal constitution and laws duly enacted.
The USSC issued a crappy ruling in the Arizona case, in that, it is a sworn duty of all law officers and state officials to enforce the law of this country. Last I read or heard, immigration laws are duly enacted and enforceable.
IMHO, both you and the SC are wrong.
29 posted on
09/24/2019 9:10:03 AM PDT by
Colonelbuzzsaw
(USAF AIR BATTLE MANAGER, retired, Trump supporter, Hurricane Michael survivor)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson