Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Part 3 was as horrible as Parts 1 and 2 were outstanding. Of course part 3 was re-written at the last second as Duvall refused to participate because he was terribly low-balled on salary.
Part 3 could have been the best. It focused on Duvall’s character Tom Haden who was murdered in the proposed movie. Three parts, three brothers murdered, each in their own episode.
In the end, there was only Michael living, the one who wanted nothing to do with the family business.


12 posted on 10/21/2019 11:36:21 AM PDT by Founding Father (The Pedophile moHAMmudd [PBUH---Pigblood be upon him]; Charles Martel for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Founding Father
Part 3 was as horrible as Parts 1 and 2 were outstanding.

A friend of mine makes the point that the movie isn't all THAT bad, and if it had been called something other than Godfather 3, and the characters had all had different names, it would be looked at in a much more favorable light as a solid mob melodrama.

24 posted on 10/21/2019 12:29:35 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Founding Father

It was embarrassing, watching Pacino in that role. And I can only imagine how humiliating it was for Andy Garcia to play opposite Coppola’s untalented daughter.


25 posted on 10/21/2019 12:31:33 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson