Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2nd Amendment Activist Who Open Carried at MO Walmart, Accepts Plea
AmmoLand ^ | 4 November, 2019 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 11/08/2019 5:03:56 AM PST by marktwain

U.S.A.-(Ammoland.com)- The youthful Second Amendment supporter who made national headlines has reached a plea deal with the Green County Prosecutor.  Dmitriy N. Andreychenko conducted his advocacy in a Missouri Walmart on 8 August, 2019, less than a week after a mass murder in an El Paso, Texas Walmart on 3 August, 2019.

Andreychenko wore body armor, had an unloaded, slung AR-15 type rifle, and a loaded, holstered pistol. He took a shopping cart into the Walmart while videoing himself on his phone. Police arrested Dmitriy on a charge of a terrorist threat in the first degree. The prosecutor initially charged him with a terrorist threat in the second degree. I predicted the prosecutor would not charge him with a first degree threat. The conduct did not match the charge.

The video demonstrates Dmitriy was calm and cooperative with the police.

The surveillance video of Dmitriy inside the store does not seem to have been released to the public.

On August 14, I predicted the prosecutor was aiming for a plea bargain to a charge of terrorist threat in the third degree, “Causing a false belief or fear”.

From the previous article:

Dmitriy consistently told the story that he was testing his Second Amendment rights, and he expected Walmart management to talk to him, not pull a fire alarm. The Third degree terrorist threat is probably the prosecutor's target.

The prosecutor and defense have agreed on a plea bargain to a somewhat reduced charge from the third degree terrorist threat, which is a class A misdemeanor. Dmitriy has agreed to a plea of “knowingly causing a false report to be made”, which is a class B misdemeanor. From greencountymo.gov:

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: banglist; mo; opencarry; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Buckeye McFrog
An idiot supposedly acting to defend 2nd amd. rights, and doing so in an idiotic manner right after a Walmart shooting.
Yeah what exactly would he expect their employees to be thinking in the wake of that?

From the article (I would have had the same reaction - all I would have thought of was the "Taxi Driver" scene where Travis Bickle shows up in a Mohawk):

"A customer in the parking lot of the Walmart observed the defendant putting on his body armor and then sling the rifle across his front while recording. Based upon his actions and recent events, she feared for the people inside the Walmart and had her boyfriend call 911. She has never been bothered by people carrying guns in Walmart before but this was different.The manager of the store is familiar with individuals carrying openly in his store,but also stated this was different."

21 posted on 11/08/2019 10:37:04 AM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
The Amazing Racist
22 posted on 11/08/2019 11:14:45 AM PST by Manic_Episode (Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Prosecutor says open carry is a right and commonly practiced in the community, in the press release.

If it's legal then why the charges?

23 posted on 11/08/2019 11:20:00 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
If it's legal then why the charges?

Often, it depends on the totality of the circumstances.

He ended up scaring some people because it was so close the the previous mass murder.

His family members advised him not to do it.

He tried to get other people involved, which would have made if more clear that he was not a threat. They refused, and he bulled ahead with what remained of his plan.

Not worth the legal fight for either side, when neither was sure of victory.

Hence, the plea deal.

24 posted on 11/08/2019 6:48:15 PM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mumblypeg

Well, in Missouri the says that open carry can be restricted by subordinate govt entities, but a CCW license supercedes that restriction. That’s govt ordinance etc.
Now, to Walmart, the law says a premises must be marked with specific signage at all entrances, and if not, then crying wolf is a nonstarter with the local police unless the armed person is otherwise breaking laws.

So, no Walmart posts , so OC in MO Walmart is lawful, unless asked to depart and the armed person refuses.

See how it works in MO?

I was in a central MO Walmart yesterday, saw three oc folks. None were a bother, went about their business. Life goes on.


25 posted on 11/09/2019 2:24:27 PM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson