Can’t imagine much of anything being more violent than literally tearing an unborn child limb from limb.
I accept this as an admission of guilt that they knew people would not like what they were doing.
“the defendants should have known Planned Parenthood would need security to prevent violence”
I’d argue that anyone who decides to make their living from committing the atrocity of killing millions of innocent children might have to chalk up their security expenses as “cost of doing business”.
“Drexel University professor and lawyer David Cohen and author of Living in the Crosshairs: The Untold Stories of Anti-Abortion Terrorism testifying as an expert witness on abortion-related violence.
So, Am I understanding this? A professor at a Catholic university testified for the abortion providers in this case? God help us all.
I’m Imagining an adult-sized enclosure that has a small ‘access hole’ (about 4” diameter) in one end to allow an articulated sharpened stainless steel hydraulic gripping tool to enter through. Invite oh..100 PP doctors to observe the ‘procedure’ on their colleague that is locked inside the enclosure. ‘Evacuate’ said colleague being careful to not crush critical organs like the cranium. Flush out interior of the enclosure. Insert doctor #99 into enclosure and repeat as needed. Sell ‘harvested’ PP doctor organs to the highest bidder (at dinner over wine) whilst enjoying the endorsement of my actions by the highest court in the country.
A lot of people don’t know abortionist Brian Finkle used to threaten pro-lifers with gun violence in Phoenix. He got busted many years ago for sexually abusing his patients and is still doing hard time for that. No charge for his abusive threats to pro-lifers.
What’s more violent than dismembering a live baby in-utero?
So in otherwords, their whole argument is. “ok, you caught and exposed us in a criminal enterprise, but that exposure means it will cost more to continue the criminal enterprise and for that you must pay?”