Posted on 12/09/2019 8:27:31 AM PST by rogerantone1
It seems obvious: Restrict gun access and people will be safer. Everything from gun bans to background checks keep being pushed as the solutions.
But theory and practice dont always match. Too often restrictions dont stop criminals and only disarm law-abiding citizens, particularly poor minorities. This only makes life easier for criminals.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
The practical result of gun control is to remove the occupational hazard of armed homeowners for criminals.
Think of it as on the job safety............/s
The purpose of registration is not to remove weapons from the hands of criminals. It is to remove weapons from the hands of victims.
As the case of the Saudi FL shooter revealed, mass murderers typically have no criminal record.
No gun control law on earth is going to stop them. We cant read peoples minds or divine their future intentions. DUH
Their intention IS to take guns from honest, non-violent citizens and leave them in the hands of violent criminals.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Robbing poor people doesn't sound very productive. I guess they have to make up the low returns in volume.
Know why Chicago has more (per capita) crime than Vermont?
Chicago (per capita) has more available criminals than Vermont.
Honorary posthumous ping to 2DV .. he’d have liked this thread .. RIP, FRiend.
Vermont residents have been able to carry concealed since 1788. Anyone under age 16 needs a note from a parent.
Yeah, the ole constitutional carry.
Well, then there was the Christchurch shooter who confessed to wanting the New Zealand gun control laws tightened after his bloody rampage and that he apparently got his firearms licence without having a home interview conducted as required by New Zealand law at the time and also using only online chatroom friends as references.
Vermont residents have been able to carry concealed since 1788.
True, but they still have a lack of violent criminals.
John Lott is moving the needle on 2nd Amendment rights with facts and logic. Thanks for posting.
For a state with such appropriate gun laws, how does Vermont find its self home to such a pantheon of Communist ding bats?
Gun grabbers always peddle the same promise that just a few more laws will make the murders go away, but they never do.
The Anti gun types, the gun grabbers, need to be removed from American society. They are a blight, a plague, on the Republic and upon our liberty.
We’ve been overrun with Massholes and NYers (like Bernie). When the courts decided students could vote where they attended school and that state senator’s would be apportioned by population (rather than two for each county), that led to one county controlling everything.
Where did the Saudi shooter get his gun? He is not a citizen and therefore cannot pass a background check.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.