Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal agencies begin process of taking Laredo land for border wall
Laredo Morning Times ^ | December 10th, 2019 | Julia Wallace

Posted on 12/10/2019 12:33:50 PM PST by BeauBo

First local landowner receives notice of court action for border wall surveys.

Last week Tony Medina Jr., who owns about three acres (near the Max A. Mandel Golf Course) right off Santa Isabel Creek — at the tip of a horseshoe bend in the Rio Grande — was notified that the government will be filing for the condemnation of his property in federal court, a process where the government seizes private property and compensates the owner.

This is the first such case that has come to light in the Laredo area.

“As of December 2, 2019, we have not received your permission to access the property, and because the Government has an immediate need to enter your property to conduct the necessary surveys, we have determined that it will be necessary to file an action in federal court to allow us to enter for these purposes for a limited period of 12 months,” reads part of the letter Medina received from Customs and Border Protection.

The government anticipates seeking this right of entry in the next 90 days, they write, the pleading for which is called a Declaration of Taking and Complaint in Condemnation. No action has been filed yet, according to court records.

Money to construct a border wall in this area of Webb County has not yet been funded; however, the government has the funding to conduct these surveys.

(Excerpt) Read more at lmtonline.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: borderwall; immigration; laredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This is not the area of the 52 miles already funded North of Laredo - it is the Northern edge of the Laredo City urban area itself, which is likely the area to be funded for Border wall in FY2020, with the direct Congressional appropriations.

They are conducting the site surveys to prepare for those projects, and this hard-nosed resistor refused to allow access for the surveyors.

So this filing is just to compel access for the surveyors, not to permanently take the land (that may come later, if he refuses to settle).

Down in the Rio Grande Valley, where FY2019 money has already been put on construction contracts, and groundbreaking is imminent, they have recently (last Friday, 6, December), filed a Declaration of Taking to actually take title to some land. We will likely see the resistors get their land condemned down there over the next several weeks/months.

Every landowner gets a fair market compensation offer first, and can argue the price in court later, if they want to try to get more - but they cannot stop/slow the construction, when the Government files its Declaration of Taking.

Bottom Line: Trump Super-Barrier coming through, everyone must stand aside.

1 posted on 12/10/2019 12:33:50 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Eminent domain.

Sometimes it’s for a highway. Sometimes for other use.

We need the wall.


2 posted on 12/10/2019 12:36:28 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

We already Know Trump’s ideas regarding eminent domain. The same applied to federal law regarding Elian Gonzales.


3 posted on 12/10/2019 12:36:40 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Build the wall around his three acres and let all the illegals have free reign there. Then later when he dies buy the land, put up the wall to run with the rest of the border wall, and you’ve got a three acre detention holding area.


4 posted on 12/10/2019 12:38:11 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
Last week Tony Medina Jr., who owns about three acres (near the Max A. Mandel Golf Course) right off Santa Isabel Creek

So ... if a drive goes wild off the golf course and sails into Mexico, can you play it as it lies? If not where do you place the ball? Can you bank off the border wall?
5 posted on 12/10/2019 12:38:59 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Thought this might interest you
PING


6 posted on 12/10/2019 12:40:04 PM PST by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

At 4 sq ft per person, that’s about 33,000 illegals you can cram in there. Works for me.


7 posted on 12/10/2019 12:44:32 PM PST by redshawk ( I want my red balloon. ( https://youtu.be/V12H2mteniE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

This is just for access to survey. They may condemn it later. And, they may not take all of it. Anytime I ever lost land to eminent domain, I made out like a bandit.


8 posted on 12/10/2019 12:46:51 PM PST by eastexsteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

I’d slightly lower their asking price for written and guaranteed permission to hang out on-site to watch construction.


9 posted on 12/10/2019 1:14:36 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Eminent domain works for me if it reduces flow of illegals and drugs across the UNprotected border.


10 posted on 12/10/2019 1:18:53 PM PST by entropy12 (You are either for free enterprise or for government price fixing. Can't be for both as convenient.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

“Build the wall around his three acres and let all the illegals have free reign there. Then later when he dies buy the land, put up the wall to run with the rest of the border wall, and you’ve got a three acre detention holding area.”

I like your thinking!


11 posted on 12/10/2019 1:24:34 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Remind me how a White House order to send in a swat team to abduct Elian Gonzales from family members with military level weapons drawn, had anything remotely legitimate to do with a child custody case weaving it’s way through our court system.

Remind me how eminent domain for federal projects on the border has anything to do with any entity other than the White House and federal courts.

These two things are not even remotely comparable.


12 posted on 12/10/2019 1:33:14 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Think of all the “eminent domain” cases that were adjudicated when the US interstate highway system was built. I think we got this.


13 posted on 12/10/2019 1:38:37 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.

How useful is the land anyway?


14 posted on 12/10/2019 1:39:40 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

I’d bet real money that the owner of those 3 acres was interested in selling it at a high profit because it is near/adjacent to a golf course-that raises the property value, for some people-he’s just afraid the government won’t pay his no doubt inflated price, so he’s showing his ass...


15 posted on 12/10/2019 1:54:20 PM PST by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys-you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

I assume that all border wall versions will cut off access to the river to everybody on this side. Has there been any discussion about rerouting the river. Not kidding about that, losing access to the river is kind of a big deal.


16 posted on 12/10/2019 2:31:11 PM PST by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

Agree.


17 posted on 12/10/2019 2:38:34 PM PST by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eastexsteve

“Anytime I ever lost land to eminent domain, I made out like a bandit.”

indeed ... almost all governmental entities exercising eminent domain would overpay a bit than go through an adversarial process, even though the government is always guaranteed to win in the end ...


18 posted on 12/10/2019 3:09:03 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
indeed ... almost all governmental entities exercising eminent domain would overpay a bit than go through an adversarial process, even though the government is always guaranteed to win in the end ...

Sure. There have been four times I gave up property to eminent domain in the past. I always settled for about 3 times what is was worth per acre. I turned around and bought more land and paid off bills and put the rest in the bank. And, all it ever took was a bit of negotiating with the land representative. Nothing ever went to court. And, three of those times it was for pipeline right-of-ways and I still technically owned the surface rights to the land and could do anything I wanted with it except grow trees on it. On top of that, they have to keep it mowed!

19 posted on 12/10/2019 3:22:27 PM PST by eastexsteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: eastexsteve

“And, three of those times it was for pipeline right-of-ways and I still technically owned the surface rights”

right-of-way generally implies ownership; are you sure you didn’t just give up a pipeline easement?


20 posted on 12/10/2019 3:29:23 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson