Posted on 02/26/2020 11:06:19 PM PST by knighthawk
WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton raked-in more cash from convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein than any other politician despite brushing off his donations by claiming he gave money to “every” Democrat.
Federal Election Commission filings show the disgraced movie mogul bundled $1.4 million for Clinton during her presidential bid in 2016 and handed her another $73,390 dating back to her 1999 New York Senate seat run.
On Tuesday, the former first lady defended her long relationship with the sex creep, quickly deflecting scrutiny from reporters by noting that Weinstein also raised funds for Barack Obama, John Kerry and Al Gore during their presidential bids.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Yo Hillary. Do Harvey a solid and put money on his books and tell him to put you on his visitor’s list.
but she didn’t intend to take it
What a deflection by highlighting the rest of the greased palms.
And no reasonable journalist will persecute her.
IBTA!
(In before the arkancide)
And she didn’t even have to sleep with him! Or rather, he didn’t have to sleep with her. He’d pay even more to prevent that.
Oh I figure the attraction would be equal just in appearances.
“...On Tuesday, the former first lady defended her long relationship with the sex creep...”
Well, he’s no longer a “sex creep” but, is now a convicted rapist...
Hey Harvey. I hope she was good and worth the money. /SuperSarc. You can put lipstick on a Marxist criminal pig but she is still just that. Even Laz wouldn’t hit on her with a 10 foot Pole or a 15 foot tall Bulgarian.
Wow. Hummus looks like AOC.
She was for it before she was against it....../s
lol
They were “good friends” until he became someone NOT to be “good friends” with.
(Wink wink nudge nudge)
Well, That’s to be expected. if there is one thing Hillary is really good at, it is taking money.
And then there’s the money Weinstein gave to the Clinton’s defense fund in ‘98...
Why is Hillary even speaking out?? We all thought she was supposed to be retired
Instead, she makes it sound like she needs to defend her public reputation because she’s got something important planned ...
like running for President??!
This story cannot be true I am sure Trump is behind this smear of prominent Democrats. After all, Democrats are the ones who champion women’s rights, correct?/s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.