Posted on 04/06/2020 10:21:47 AM PDT by Kaslin
“Give me a stay-at-home order out of an abundance of caution for I certainly would prefer that over you giving me death”
– Patrick Henry’s lesser-known and decidedly more cautious brother, Frank
War is the sacrificing of lives for the preservation of your country’s way of life. Sometimes it’s for the preservation of your civilization.
Today, pundits and politicians alike tell us that we are facing our gravest challenge since World War II: the fight to destroy the Coronavirus. To that noble end, we are to hole ourselves up in our homes, and shutter our restaurants, schools and businesses. We’re even to close our borders and severely restrict any gatherings. Only “essential” operations can continue. Not even Disneyland is spared.
We must do this, you see, because our nation is at “war” with the Coronavirus.
So they say.
What’s the “war” here, you ask? It’s to slow the spread of the virus, so that our underequipped hospitals can gear up for the anticipated flood of new patients. By doing this, we will ultimately save thousands—maybe tens of thousands—of lives.
To do our part of the “war,” the narrative goes, we must self-isolate and close down our world for as long as it takes. We will do so even if it utterly collapses the world’s economy into a depression. Because, as Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo phrased it: “Even if all this saves one life, it will have been worth it.”
It’s tripe. No, it’s worse than tripe. I put it plainly to you that what we are doing is actually the opposite of war. In fact, it is the height of cowardice. It is complete capitulation. It might even border on the French kind (okay, maybe that’s too far).
When we think of war, we cannot extricate the inevitable causalities and other painful sacrifices that come with war. They are endemic to what war is. In World War II, America and its allies understood they would lose men, women and children, buildings and even whole cities. But it was all for our collective fight to defend and preserve Western civilization.
It begs the question: What is the purpose of war? The answer should be obvious: to defend a country’s way of life, and its values. Sometimes it’s to save civilization itself. Many wonderful quotes speak to the glory of such sacrifices of life and limb: “I’d rather die on my feet than live on my knees” (Emiliano Zapata Salazar). “Give me liberty, or give me death” (Patrick Henry); “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few” (Winston Churchill).
And so on. But one thing is clear from such sentiments and from history: War is not to protect lives. On the contrary, we specifically contemplate that we will sacrifice lives in the defense of our civilization. But the stated goal of today’s “war” seeks precisely the opposite. Everything is about sacrificing our civilization so that we can save lives. This is an upside-down “war” where we are only saving lives, not giving them; and where freedom and our actual civilization mean little.
It’s an Orwellian “doublespeak” twist on the definition of “war.” All the while, the press and our political leaders would have you believe that we’re all doing our share in this “war,” by staying at home, not going to work, not sending our children to school, and otherwise choking our economy. We’re being courageous, and we’re all doing our part!
They make you feel like you’re a hero for staying at home. You’re not.
It’s the “Department of Defense.” It’s not the “Department of Saving Lives.” But this particular “war” seems to be only about saving lives. Other than Trump, virtually no one discusses the economic destruction of the country, nor the possibility that every day propels us further to a proverbial point of no return. Virtually no one discusses the immediate impact upon the lonely and suicidal, children, and the elderly (some of whose caretakers cannot take care of them anymore). Virtually no one discusses the impending poverty of millions, many of whom suddenly have suddenly lost their life savings, their stipends, their businesses, or their jobs.
Almost no one considers how the lack of food, suicide, other diseases, violence, and general poverty will foster desperation and crime. And virtually no one discusses the tragic irony that many more will likely die as collateral damage from such things, all in our great effort to avoid people dying from the coronavirus.
Indeed, if you dare suggest we consider the collateral consequences to our civilization in any way whatsoever, many will look at you as if you’re advocating child sacrifice (or worse: that you’re insensitive).
It shouldn’t be surprising. After decades of our culture insisting that America was built on the backs of slaves and the slaughter of American Indians, and that capitalist robber barons have advanced capitalism only to exploit American workers, it’s a wonder that anyone thinks there’s anything worth fighting for, let alone dying for.
I have more faith than that. And I’m willing to bet that many more of us are willing to take the risk that the virus might infect us, and even the very slight chance that we might die from it—if the alternative is the collapse of our nation.
But few seem to be presenting this as a choice. And the governments of our cities, states, and countries all seem to have made the decision for us.
Vidkun Quisling is leading the charge.
War? More like a preemptive surrender.
We have surrendered without firing a shot.
So label it a French War and hide till it’s over
In all likelihood, whether an accidental release or otherwise, China views our going out in public with an approving standing O.
One problem with taking the “War” analogy to the extreme is when the final wreckage is tabulated the inevitable demand will be “Nuke Peking”. The anger could rise to that level.
Not resistance to China. Resistance to Little Hitler Fauci and Bill Gates who wants a complete national lockdown for at least 90 days. That would be the end of our country which would be fine with the elitist globalists.
Yes all the countries outside of the PRC should band together and take out the PRCs once and for all!
That should be the 1st thing that happens not the last and led off by 1000s of EMP bombs 1st! And not just US but the Ruskies Britian Germany France Pakistan and India!
See what I mean? I do think the anger could very well rise to that level. The urge to respond will be irresistible.
PEACE?? I don't think so.
No. Capitulation.
The PRCs are now bragging how their economy has rebounded, selling fake testing equipment and non functioning masks to the rest of the world. Ok so maybe just a world wide economic war (disengagement from them) against them would/will do:-)
Asymmetric war. CW2 We’ve lost too many battles to mention.
6. “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” – Sun Tzu
Hello, Mr Tzu.
Good article.
Once we would fight and die for this grand experiment in self rule. Now we will toss aside the foundation for a little perceived safety.
My oh my, where has my country gone?
500,000 mostly young men were sacrificed during WW2 in order to defend our country. Today we are trashing the country to save 50,000? lives.
To say were are fighting “our” WW2 is pathetic and demeans the sacrifices made in WW2.
Bump
Not trying to save the 50,000 dead this year from influenza A and B.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.