Posted on 04/27/2020 12:33:59 PM PDT by Kaslin
Wake County, North Carolina continues to ban Christians from their central rite of communion while allowing hand-delivered food so long as it's served by restaurants instead of pastors.
Like many other locales across the nation, in the name of reducing coronavirus transmission Wake County, North Carolina continues to ban Christians from their central rite of communion while allowing hand-delivered food so long as it’s served by restaurants instead of pastors.
After I reported last week on threats against a local church for holding services within government social-distancing and hygiene guidelines while grocery, hardware, and other retail stores are allowed to operate within more expansive rules, the nonprofit legal group Alliance Defending Freedom warned Wake County their rules “unconstitutionally treat[] churches and other houses of worship worse than similarly situated non-religious organizations.”
Wake County is the home to Raleigh, the state capital, and the state’s most populous county, at more than 1.1 million residents.
“The government is not being neutral toward religion when it treats religious groups and individuals worse than everyone else,” said ADF Senior Counsel Ryan Tucker in a statement. “We support the efforts of public officials to prioritize health and safety, but it is illogical and unconstitutional to apply government orders in a way that singles out churches for harsher treatment. We are asking the county to repeal its ban and avoid the need for any litigation over the matter.”
Wake County subsequently updated its guidance, but it still discriminates against religion by applying stricter rules to its exercise than to non-religious activities. The county’s order restricting communion has not been rescinded or replaced with another legally binding order, according to the county’s Covid-19 information portal. The county has only issued nonbinding guidance appearing to make some exceptions while still presuming to tell religious Americans how they are permitted to worship and mandating stricter rules for sacrament distribution than for restaurant food.
The latest county order regarding communion is an amendment to the initial order dated April 15. It states, “The following contact activities are strictly prohibited: handing out literature during the service, distributing communion elements, and personal collection of tithes/offerings.”
The county’s April 24 guidance issued in response to ADF’s complaint imposes the following rules on sacrament preparation and distribution:
Communion
Religious groups that want to share the sacraments with their congregations can do so in the following ways:
- Invite members in advance to bring their own sacraments to the service;
- Place the sacraments in self-serve packages for easy pickup prior to the day of the service; and/or
- Put the sacraments in self-serve packages and leave them on a table for convenient drive-by pickup right before the service begins.
Assembly of self-serve packages should be done using proper food safety guidelines. Drivers must also keep six feet of distance between their vehicles when picking up the sacraments, and the tables holding the sacraments must be unattended.
In its response to ADF’s letter, the county also reiterated: “The county’s proclamation prohibits members of faith communities who aren’t from the same family or household from touching others or shared objects such as communion elements, literature, or offering plates.”
Needless to say, restaurants, hardware stores, and grocery stores are not required to have customers bring their own food and other items for preparation. They are not required to keep all customers from different families from touching each other or any other object inside their stores.
These nonreligious entities are also not required to prepare food pickup orders a day in advance. And it is not clear how a virus that reportedly can last on surfaces for several days can be contained by requiring pastors to prepare “self-serve packages” and put them on a table for people to pick up.
These are arbitrary and discriminatry rules not dictated by health considerations at all, but some bureaucrat’s desire to micromanage sacred matters that are completely outside of government purview, according to American legal precedent and historic traditions. Assuming ignorance instead of ill intent, one can only guess that whoever made these rules has never consulted with clergy or theologians about the preparation and distribution of what millions of Christians believe is Jesus Christ’s own body and blood.
If the bureacracy had done this, they would have learned that myriad historic Christian traditions, including of the Roman Catholic Church, Orthodox churches of all varieties, conservative Lutherans, many Anglicans, and many others absolutely refuse to treat God’s precious body and blood by placing it in plastic packages and putting it on drive-by tables for people to pick up like fast food or items in a bake sale. That is sacrilege.
Not only do state officials have no right to demand that Christians commit sacrilege or be forced to break God’s commandments to take communion and assemble frequently in worship, their demand is also deeply offensive in the same way these officials would tie themselves in knots to avoid were the potentially offended parties Muslims or LGBT people.
Unless Wake County wants to start locking down Home Depot, farmer’s markets, all restaurants (the county also allows sit-down restaurant service!), newspapers, garden centers, plumbers and HVAC businesses, and dog grooming services with these same ludicrous regulations so that churches are not treated as second-class establishments, they need to end their offensive, targeted, and ignorant discrimination against sacramentalist Christians immediately.
U.S. Attorney General William Barr has issued legal guidance demanding precisely this to satisfy constitutional and federal law, and Wake County is clearly in violation of this guidance:
even in times of emergency, when reasonable and temporary restrictions are placed on rights, the First Amendment and federal statutory law prohibit discrimination against religious institutions and religious believers. Thus, government may not impose special restrictions on religious activity that do not also apply to similar nonreligious activity. For example, if a government allows movie theaters, restaurants, concert halls, and other comparable places of assembly to remain open and unrestricted, it may not order houses of worship to close, limit their congregation size, or otherwise impede religious gatherings. Religious institutions must not be singled out for special burdens.
If common decency won’t persuade Wake County to stop this ignorant, unconstitutional, and offensive disparate treatment of Christians, a lawsuit should.
The Resurrection is Against the Law
An excerpt from Bill Wylie-Kellermann’s classic Seasons of Faith and Conscience (1991).
The sealing of the tomb is, I believe, notoriously misunderstood. I grew up with a Sunday School notion that to seal the tomb was a matter of hefting the big stone and cementing it tight. The seal, in my mind’s eye, was something like first-century caulking–puttying up the cracks to keep the stink in. Not so. This is a legal seal. Cords would be strung across the rock and anchored at each end with clay. To move the stone would break the seal and indicate tampering.
The event conspicuously echoes the story of Daniel sealed in the den of lions. “And a stone was brought and laid upon the mouth of the den, and the king sealed it with his own signet and with the signet of his lords, that nothing might be changed concerning Daniel” (Daniel 6:18). As there, this is a legal lock on the tomb door–not air tight, but politically tight. To move the stone and break the seal is a civil crime. The resurrection is against the law.
The seal is also a recurring theme in the book of Revelation. Remember the scroll of history sealed with seven seals? Only One is worthy to break them and look upon or unveil the truth: that One is the Lamb who was slain. The seal is a claim of ownership and authority. Its meaning in Revelation is at least that God in Christ reigns sovereign over all history and in all events.
Caesar, in Pilate, on the other hand, violently disputes the claim. He has set his seal of approval on Jesus’ death, and now he guarantees it with troops. Secured by security forces. When the seal is broken in the resurrection, it stands among the signs that the power of the powers (death in all its forms) has been broken. The dominion of political authority–especially inflated, aggressive–and imperial authority has been cut to the heart.
This sounds like just another restriction on religious liberty by secularist leftists in the county government. As long as the priest or minister wears a mask, uses tongs and wears gloves, where is the risk?
As long as they’re not burdening the moslem foatguckers with any tiresome prohibitions !
The stipulations for acceptance of communion hosts/wafers is unacceptable and violates all the tenets of the Catholic Church.
In NY mayor deblowjob has mosques open but synagogues and churches closed
‘As long as the priest or minister wears a mask, uses tongs and wears gloves, where is the risk?’
the mask and the gloves are cosmetics, and even with the gloves the distributor must not touch the recipient’s hands...but the tongs might not be a bad idea, hadn’t thought about that...a couple of things in liturgical rites that you’ll probably not see again is the handshaking at the sign of peace (which was ridiculous from the start), communion on the tongue, communion in the spoon, and such...
Never had an issue having communion at home.
Raleigh, the capital, has the SMALLEST CATHEDRAL in America..... looked like a CHAPEL.......NC has the SMALLEST CATHOLIC citizen population in America also....used to be 4% when we lived there!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.