Posted on 05/13/2020 11:45:02 AM PDT by sockmonkey
The US Senate voted down an amendment to the USA Patriot Act on Wednesday that would create a tougher standard for government investigators to collect the web search and browsing histories of people in the states. The bipartisan amendment, proposed by Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, a Democrat and Sen. Steve Daines of Montana, a Republican, would've required the Department of Justice to show probable cause when requesting approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to collect the data for counterterrorism or counterintelligence investigations.
Before the vote, Daines told the Senate the bill was necessary to keep the government from intruding into the most sensitive information of internet users in the US. "If you want to see an American's search history, then you better go to a judge and get a warrant," he said.
The amendment, which required 60 votes to pass and failed with a final tally of 59 ayes and 37 nays, was one of several slated to be considered Wednesday to amend the Patriot Act. A separate amendment drafted by Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, a Republican, would expressly allow the collection of web search and browsing data under section 215 of the Patriot Act, which doesn't require that investigators show probable cause. The Wyden-Daines amendment, by contrast, would've given government the ability to request the data under a separate part of the law, Title I, which does require probable cause.
The vote came more than a month after three sections of the USA Patriot Act expired in March. Section 215 allows the government to collect data that's "relevant" to counterterrorism or counterintelligence investigations, with approval of the FISA court. Also under consideration Wednesday is a bipartisan amendment from Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, a Democrat, and Mike Lee of Arizona, a Republican, that would strengthen the process for flagging potential violations of constitutional privacy rights in government requests. Another amendment, from Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a Republican, would require warrants for data collection on people in the US, and limit the use of data collected through the Patriot Act as evidence in criminal cases or lawsuits that are outside the jurisdiction of the FISA court.
In addition to his amendment permitting the collection of browsing and search history without probable cause, McConnell drafted an amendment that would limit the use of Patriot Act powers for investigating candidates for federal office. The amendment comes as President Donald Trump and members of his administration have criticized FBI investigations into members of his campaign team using Patriot Act powers.
McConnell didn't address the Senate regarding the Wyden-Daines amendment, and his office didn't respond to a request for comment on his drafted amendments.
Wyden had said his amendment was especially important now that millions of Americans are at home to help curb the spread of the coronavirus, relying on the internet to work, educate their children and access information.
"Stand up for those millions of people who have to be at home," Wyden had said.
Being in TX, interesting Cruz voted yea, Cornyn, Nay
Trump needs to say - I will veto.
repatriate send home the bad dangerous terrorist-related “immigrants” and we can get our civil liberties back!
That is not surprising. Cruz for Liberty. Cornyn supports the Washington establishment.
Cornyn is not one to be trusted to do the right thing. Ever. I will have to be holding my nose tightly to be compelled to vote for his worthless, back-stabbing arse yet again, this November.
I can’t stand the sonovabitch.
The Senate voted it down, no need for a veto.
I support restricting the government’s ability to snoop on us, I’m surprised you don’t.
Interesting division on the votes.
10 Democrats voted against the Wyden-Daines amendment that would have prohibited FBI warrantless surveillance of web browser history.
Bernie Sanders didn’t show up to vote. It was defeated by one vote.
The 10 Democrats who joined GOP in defeating amendment to stop FBI warrantless surveillance of web browser history: Carper, Casey, Feinstein, Hassan, Jones, Kaine, Manchin, Shaheen, Warner and Whitehorse.
59 means most didn't want it to pass and they negotiated which ones got to make their show vote in favor.
If Cruz had voted no someone else would have changed their no vote to yes. If there were already 59 yes votes Cruz probably would have voted no.
[The Senate voted it down, no need for a veto.
I support restricting the government’s ability to snoop on us, I’m surprised you don’t.]
*** 59 means most didn’t want it to pass and they negotiated which ones got to make their show vote in favor. ***
I agree. It’s all theater and there’s little difference when I look at the things both sides support.
Maybe it is a neocon/neoliberal thing, but since I am neither, I just feel sick a lot.
Trump must veto this.
They were only amendments, so I don’t believe it would have gone to President Trump yet. Only final bills go to the president.
That what these amendments supposedly were to do. So perhaps he is upset that they were not accepted, I venture to guess, which means he desires the same as you. 8>)
Agree completely, there is no place for secret courts and spying on citizens in a free country.
Upthread he said he wants the Patriot act extension vetoed.
I agree, it never should have been passed.
But the vote wasn’t about it being extended. It was merely a vote on the amendments offered up to be included in the extension passage, when and if it passes. The amendments offered up did not pass, as it needed 60 votes to pass. Which means that pass or fail nothing goes to the president at this point. That won’t occur until the extension its self is passed. Then the president can veto it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.