Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest Move by Flynn Judge Has Raised Some Eyebrows
Townhall.com ^ | May 24, 2020 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 05/24/2020 10:36:49 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Michael Flynn case has gone off the hinges. In reality, there is no case. The Department of Justice has filed a motion to dismiss the case against the former national security adviser after new documents showed a large-scale plot from within the FBI to entrap Flynn despite a lack of evidence concerning Russian collusion. Remember, Flynn made some phone calls to the Russians which made him a target. These weren’t pernicious calls.This was standard operating procedure for any incoming administration. Yet, James Comey wanted to get Flynn at all costs. 

No one has opposed the motion to dismiss. The prosecutor has resigned there is no case, but Judge Emmet Sullivan wants to keep this circus act going. He’s allowing Trump-deranged lawyers to file amicus briefs and appointed a retired Judge John Gleeson to fight the DOJ motion and see if the federal courts could file perjury charges against Flynn, now that he’s fought to withdraw that plea deal regarding the bogus “lying to the FBI” charge.

Sullivan is overreaching and Flynn’s legal team has filed a new petition to drop the case and get the former general out of legal purgatory. The DC Court of Appeals could have rejected the writ of mandamus outright. They didn’t. Instead, their actions point to the court being highly disturbed by Sullivan’s actions, as they’ve ordered him to respond personally to the writ in the next ten days. The petition, filed by Flynn’s attorney, Sidney Powell, calls for the case to be dismissed, the judge removed, and overall legal relief for her client. Sullivan had called Flynn a traitor in open court. It shouldn’t be shocking if a good chunk of this writ is agreed upon. Some legal advisers noted that this writ has already climbed a huge hurdle with a response like this, which is the most drastic of options for Sullivan. 

Yet, his actions in response to the Flynn legal team’s writ of mandamus has raised some eyebrows; he’s hired a high-powered attorney to do his work for him in this area (via WaPo):

The federal judge who refused a Justice Department request to immediately drop the prosecution of former Trump adviser Michael Flynn has hired a high-profile trial lawyer to argue his reasons for investigating whether dismissing the case is legally or ethically appropriate.

In a rare step that adds to this criminal case’s already unusual path, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has retained Beth Wilkinson to represent him in defending his decision to a federal appeals court in Washington, according to a person familiar with the hire who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. The U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is now examining the judge’s actions and the larger case against Flynn after lawyers for President Trump’s former national security adviser asked the court to force Sullivan to toss Flynn’s guilty plea.

Wilkinson, known for her top-notch legal skills and get-results style, is expected to file a notice with the court in the coming week about representing the judge. She declined to comment when reached Friday evening. Sullivan also declined to comment through his office.

A federal judge doesn’t typically hire private counsel to respond to an appeals court…

What is Judge Sullivan thinking? A judge tells Court of Appeals he needs a lawyer to represent him on his management and rulings in a case? Where outcome, whether he likes it or not, is obvious under Circuit precedent? Are plaudits for anti-Trump cred worth his reputation? 1/2— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) May 23, 2020

He’s totally entitled to fume on the record that Flynn looked him in the eye and swore that he lied, that Flynn’s erratic litigation strategy caused the court needless effort, and that he thinks DOJ is wrong. But the law requires him to grant the dismissal. Do your job. 2/2— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) May 23, 2020

Flynn update via WaPo:

Judge Sullivan - ordered to explain his reasons for not granting the DOJ motion to dismiss - has hired a lawyer to apparently do his work for him. pic.twitter.com/7kGeolVRn4— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 23, 2020

Certainly an odd development. Theres no reason Sullivan can't respond to appeals court order himself.

WapPo:
"A federal judge doesn’t typically hire private counsel to respond to an appeals court"

Unsure if the appeals court will allow this.

Full story:https://t.co/70chy4CKsZ— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 23, 2020

I am less harsh on the idea of a judge hiring a lawyer, just because his day job might be very busy. But bluntly, I find it weird that he has hired such a high powered attorney who is also likely very expensive on a judge’s salary. Unless he’s pro bono

Cc @mVespa1 @PolitiBunny https://t.co/2ry1VufZ8e— (((Aaron “Worthing” Walker))) (@AaronWorthing) May 24, 2020

Question: is there any indication this is pro-bono? Because if not, that’s a ridiculous amount of money to spend on it. Cc @mVespa1 https://t.co/qXyYLQT8Go— (((Aaron “Worthing” Walker))) (@AaronWorthing) May 23, 2020

DC-based lawyer Aaron Worthing asked if Wilkerson was doing this pro bono since the bill is probably going to be quite steep, especially for someone on a judge’s salary.

There was speculation that Sullivan refused to toss the case, appointed Gleeson to keep it going, and hoped this could spill into after the election, where a Democratic DOJ could drop the motion to dismiss. 

If that was the game plan, it could get torpedoed soon. 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: doj; fbi; flynn; michaelflynn; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2020 10:36:49 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He should hire Flynn’s lawyer. She’s done a great job!/snicker


2 posted on 05/24/2020 10:38:56 AM PDT by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin
"There was speculation that Sullivan refused to toss the case, appointed Gleeson to keep it going, and hoped this could spill into after the election, where a Democratic DOJ could drop the motion to dismiss."

Same thing with Durham's work. It's critical that some punishment is meted out before the election. Losing the Senate or presidency and/or failure to retake the House will mean EVERYTHING is shut down and they will all skate. It's bad enough that most of them are going to skate, but this would be a disaster.

4 posted on 05/24/2020 10:52:09 AM PDT by DJ Frisat ( (optional, printed after my name on post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

DNC paying the bills?


5 posted on 05/24/2020 10:56:53 AM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The longer Flynn can be kept in legal limbo, the longer he is silenced from telling the truth behind Obama’s illegal billions. That need to tell the truth is what started this persecution in the first place.
6 posted on 05/24/2020 10:58:57 AM PDT by llevrok (Vote while it is still legal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The biggest reason for a judge to hire an attorney in a matter like this is that he may know he's facing personal legal or ethical exposure.
7 posted on 05/24/2020 11:01:08 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hiring this lawyer might just be another delaying tactic. Sullivan could claim his new lawyer needs more time to become familiar with the case. If I was the Appeal Court my response would be ‘what part of within 10 days don't you understand? ‘
8 posted on 05/24/2020 11:03:41 AM PDT by Nateman (If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
DC-based lawyer Aaron Worthing asked if Wilkerson was doing this pro bono since the bill is probably going to be quite steep, especially for someone on a judge’s salary.

The major Washington firms do pro bono work all the time for highly politicized causes. It's just another form of political warfare. One firm that can remain nameless represented Greenpeace in a suit against the Navy for colliding with one of their protest vessels. That firm, almost entirely allied with the Democratic party, had lobbying arms and law partners raking in tens of millions of dollars representing the defense industry (and thereby, arguably raising the cost of acquisition of weapons systems and technology for the nation's defense) but managed to find the time to represent, gratis, a protest organization that was suing the Navy (thereby driving up the cost to the taxpayers of defending the suit.) A nice snarky move, that allows them to attribute the hours donated as pro bono representation, while getting in some kicks and generating some bad press for the Republicans in the White House at the time.

The role of law firms acting as cut outs - a law Perkins Coie in the Russiagate Scam - is something as big as the proverbial 900 lb. gorilla in the living room, that the press in DC cannot manage to find with both hands. So, expecting them to notice this pro bono practice is maybe a bit much...

9 posted on 05/24/2020 11:04:27 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I may be Captain Obvious, but someone this biased shouldn’t be a judge. How he rose up the ranks into his position is beyond me.


10 posted on 05/24/2020 11:04:43 AM PDT by KittyKares (Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

To quote Skeletor, Sullivan is an actual retard.


11 posted on 05/24/2020 11:05:42 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (BLACK LIVES MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

18 U.S.C. § 242 - U.S. Code. Deprivation of rights under color of law.


12 posted on 05/24/2020 11:06:57 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In Sullivan’s mind, the ends justify the means.


13 posted on 05/24/2020 11:06:58 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This judge is going to wind up out on his arce.


14 posted on 05/24/2020 11:15:21 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

In Sullivan’s mind, the ends justify the means.


Number one rule in the communist leftist playbook


15 posted on 05/24/2020 11:17:11 AM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KittyKares

What if the Judge was part of it? I admittedly have nothing to back this up and I will give the benefit of the doubt to the court in what has been a highly irregular case from start to finish, but why has this case dragged on for so long?

Was the goal to punish Flynn or to keep him silent? As long as this continues he is under a gag order by the court. Is that more important to the deep state than their pound of flesh?

What is it that Flynn will say once this gag order is lifted and is that the reason it has dragged on for years? Will Flynn come out and talk about the pressure the special counsel persecutors put on him to make something up about Trump? They did that to Papadopoulus who has said so multiple times.

Was there backchannel communication going on between the Judge and the conspirators? I would have to see evidence of this, but the whole thing is so bizarre and legally tenuous that I cannot dismiss the “conspiracy theory” out of hand.

They could have moved for sentencing long ago, but they didn’t. Why? The only benefits I can see to dragging this out are to keep Flynn silent, preserve the talking point for the left/media, and not deal perhaps the biggest blow to the already eroded credibility of the Mueller investigation.

They know they are not going to “punish” Flynn, but until the case is formally dismissed they can muzzle him. That appears to be the goal and the court now appears to be trying to carry it out with the bizarre legal wrangling (at least until November).


16 posted on 05/24/2020 11:17:53 AM PDT by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
Representing a sitting judge pro bono or not means that neither that attorney, nor likely their firm, can appear before that judge on behalf of a client in the future.
17 posted on 05/24/2020 11:20:39 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KittyKares
"I may be Captain Obvious, but someone this biased shouldn’t be a judge. How he rose up the ranks into his position is beyond me."

I understand and commiserate, but the fact is that our nation's law schools are inundated with liberals, who choose who gets accepted, and who determine the curriculum. They promote group think, and there are few groups in the nation more arrogant (with less reason) than law professors.

That we have any reasonable and conservative judges is somewhat miraculous. Regarding 'rising up through the ranks', in all walks of society this is determined less by talent and hard work, and more by politics. It's just the way things are - but they need to change.

18 posted on 05/24/2020 11:23:45 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Beth Wilkinson is David Gregory’s wife.....she was also Kavanaugh’s attorney! He almost didn’t survive!


19 posted on 05/24/2020 11:25:08 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The key question here is

What intercept -- produced by Comey/Brennan/Clappers' illegal domestic use of "The HAMMER" (illicit surveillance supercomputer) at Ft. Washington, MD -- provided the "dirt" with which they are blackmailing Judge Emmet Sullivan?

20 posted on 05/24/2020 11:34:03 AM PDT by TXnMA (Anagram: "PANDEMIC --> DEM PANIC"<P>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson