Posted on 05/27/2020 8:00:00 AM PDT by SJackson
The “religious and racial” nature of Muslim sex grooming gangs.
Speaking under the pseudonym of “Ella,” a British woman recently revealed that her Muslim rapists called her “a white c*nt, a white wh*re, and a white b*tch,” during the more than 100 times she was raped in her youth by the mostly Pakistani grooming gang.
“We need to understand racially and religiously aggravated crime if we are going to prevent it and protect people from it and if we are going to prosecute correctly for it,” she said in her recent interview. “Prevention, protection and prosecution — all of them are being hindered because we are neglecting to properly address the religious and racist aspects of grooming gang crimes…. It’s telling them that it’s OK to hate white people.”
That there are “racial” and “religious” aspects to the epidemic of Muslims raping Western European women cannot be overstated. Put differently, the males of a particular religion tend to fantasize that the females of a particular race are nymphomaniacal masochists who are hot for being degraded and abused. Consider a few earlier examples:
Even Dr. Taj Hargey, a British imam, confirms that the majority of the UK’s “imams promote grooming rings.” He said Muslim men are taught that women are “second-class citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have absolute authority” and that the imams preach a doctrine “that denigrates all women, but treats whites with particular contempt.”
For those acquainted with history, such Muslim behavior towards European women should be unsurprising—stretching, as it does, all the way back to the founder of Islam: In order to prompt his men to invade Byzantine territory—where the Arabs’ nearest European neighbors lived—the prophet Muhammad enticed them with the potential of sexually enslaving the “yellow” women (an apparent reference to their fair hair). It is “impossible to disconnect Islam from the Viking slave-trade,” M.A. Khan, a former Muslim, writes of the following centuries, “because the supply was absolutely meant for meeting [the] Islamic world’s unceasing demand for the prized white slaves” and for “white sex-slaves.”
Moreover, just as Muslim rapists see Western women as “pieces of meat,” “nothing more than sluts,” and “white whores,” so did Islam’s earliest luminaries always describe European women, beginning with those nearest to them, of Byzantium. Thus, for Abu Uthman al-Jahiz (b. 776), a prolific court scholar, the females of Constantinople were the “most shameless women in the whole world … [T]hey find sex more enjoyable” and “are prone to adultery.” Abd al-Jabbar (b. 935), another prominent scholar, claimed that “adultery is commonplace in the cities and markets of Byzantium”—so much so that even “the nuns from the convents went out to the fortresses to offer themselves to monks.”
Several centuries later, in a written excerpt that goes to great (if not pornographic) lengths, Muhammad bin Hamed al-Isfahani (b. 1125), a celebrated Persian court scholar and poet, explained how he once saw a ship containing “three hundred lovely Frankish women, full of youth and beauty” arrive by sea. The flattery ends there and the fantasying begins:
They glowed with ardour for carnal intercourse. They were all licentious harlots, proud and scornful, who took and gave, foul-fleshed and sinful . . . making love and selling themselves for gold . . . with nasal voices and fleshy thighs, blue-eyed and grey-eyed. . . . They dedicated as a holy offering what they kept between their thighs. . . . They maintained that they could make themselves acceptable to God by no better sacrifice than this. . . . They made themselves targets for men’s darts.
After Saladin conquered Jerusalem from the Franks in 1187, this same Muhammad bin Hamed, who was present and aged 62, launched into yet another sadomasochistic tirade extolling the sexual debasement of European women and children—approximately eight-thousand of whom were enslaved:
How many well-guarded women were profaned, how many queens were ruled, and nubile girls married, and noble women given away, and miserly women forced to yield themselves, and women who had been kept hidden [nuns] stripped of their modesty . . . and free women occupied [meaning “penetrated”], and precious ones used for hard work, and pretty things put to the test, and virgins dishonoured and proud women deflowered . . . and happy ones made to weep! How many noblemen [Muslim lords] took them as concubines, how many ardent men blazed for one of them, and celibates were satisfied by them, and thirsty men sated by them, and turbulent men able to give vent to their passion. How many lovely women were the exclusive property of one man, how many great ladies were sold at low prices . . . and lofty ones abased . . . and those accustomed to thrones dragged down!
In short, past and present, not only have Muslim men had a “penchant” for European women; they have always justified this lust by portraying their victims as wanton nymphomaniacs, eager to be sexually debased.
Accordingly, “Ella”—this British woman who like many others was repeatedly raped while being called “a white c*nt, a white wh*re, and a white b*tch” who “wants it”—is at the very least correct to point out that this ongoing epidemic will continue “because we are neglecting to properly address the religious and racist aspects of grooming gang crimes.”
Historical quotes used in this article were sourced from and referenced in Ibrahim’s book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West.
..................
So Britain has gone the way of the legend of King Arthur.
The British elected officials encouraged the savages to set up their sex ring and to rape young women by not prosecuting them, and then throwing in jail anyone who pointed this fact out.
Muslims and Democrats are the same people.
This is what every muzzie man thinks and given an opportunity will try to act it out.
With these monsters we are to live alongside...i think not. kill or be killed.
The British people have it in themselves to put a stop to this. Bring back capital punishment. Engage their filthy lies with truth. And, for the love of God, return to the Christian faith!
Well, the ladies DO want it. They vote for it every single time they get in the booth. There is NOTHING they hate more than their Fathers, Brothers, Sons, and Husbands.
They wanted them over there,now they have them. Let them enjoy them.
But the United States of America is about to learn the same lesson the hard way, also.
In fact, the United States is pretty down that road already.
The United States has doubled its muslims holding elective Offices.
Far from learning from the experiences of Western Europe, the Citizens of the United States prefer and wish to repeat their fate.
I know, it won't happen here because we got guns. So did the people of Brittan. The Government did not take them. They asked the people to turn them in to the Government. The people complied. Just as it will happen here. The Government has learned, and learned well that when they genuinely want to get something, crate a panic and the sheep will demand to be ruled and controlled. Not only will the biggest majority comply, but experience has shown that those who do comply will turn in those who do not comply to the authorities. And they will be dealt with quickly, violently, and severely. When they sincerely get ready to take the firearms[ and they will, the only question remaining to be answered is when] they will create a panic, who knows what, the last one happened to be a virus. Then they will announce that, for some reason, people need to turn in their firearms in at their local police station. Most, but not all will comply. Those that do not comply will be turned in to the authorities.
You got that right. Some people never learn.
“One day a king will come, and the sword will rise again.”
“I know, it won’t happen here because we got guns. So did the people of Britain. The Government did not take them. They asked the people to turn them in to the Government.”
What we have in America are hundreds of millions of unregistered guns. All guns in Britain have been registered since the 1920’s. When the British police demanded people turn in their guns, they already knew who owned what.
The 4473 filled out at the gun store is not proof of ownership (yeah, secret illegal databases, etc). Even the most hardcore gun-haters hesitate at door to door searches.
Americans showed a lot of defiance and civil disobedience during the COVID crisis. That will pale when Dear Leader orders “round up all the guns” and then things will turn deadly.
Paki grooming gangs hardly exist this side of the pond. Yes, it’s all those bad old guns owned anonymously. Omar & Achmed don’t want to be perforated and as muzzies they’re easy to spot.
In my opinion, COVID has a silver lining, of sorts: the powers who would rule us have learned they have skin in the game; i.e. their own miserable hides.
In America, muzzies and gungrabbers have a common enemy: the armed citizen. Britain has gone Islamofascist authoritarian. Their population is disarmed and helpless. We’re not there yet by a long shot.
Partial proof: In Britain gungrabbers lecture us Yanks for our “lax gun laws”. In America they rail against “NRA and gun manufacturers” with a side of “white nationalism” thrown in.
I'm more interested in preventing and protecting. I'll bet if the UK had concealed carry and half the women were armed, rapes would drop almost to zero after a few dozen predators were permanently removed from the gene pool. Why worry about prosecuting when the natural solution permanently prevents these evil thugs from attacking another women?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.