19-715 Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP
Another Trump case: 7-2 against Trump; case continues with lower courts
THOMAS, J., and ALITO, J., filed dissenting opinions.
“DONALD J. TRUMP, ET AL., PETITIONERS
19–715 v.
MAZARS USA, LLP, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
DONALD J. TRUMP, ET AL., PETITIONERS
19–760 v.
DEUTSCHE BANK AG, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
[July 9, 2020]
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the
Court.
Over the course of five days in April 2019, three committees of the U. S. House of Representatives issued four subpoenas seeking information about the finances of President
Donald J. Trump, his children, and affiliated businesses.
We have held that the House has authority under the Constitution to issue subpoenas to assist it in carrying out its
legislative responsibilities. The House asserts that the financial information sought here—encompassing a decade’s
worth of transactions by the President and his family—will
help guide legislative reform in areas ranging from money
laundering and terrorism to foreign involvement in U. S. “
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdf
Lol, the supreme Court proves again that it is a completely broken institution. No one would have agreed to the constitution if this was thought to be the rule. How do i know that. Commonwealth sense logic. Not the type of people and not the type of era to accept giving their privacy uo.