[PghBaldy]

"In a footnote, Roberts notes that the "daylight between our opinion" and the Thomas "dissent" is "not as great as that label might suggest." "We agree that Presidents are neither absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas nor insulated by a heightened need standard." Here's some key language: "We agree that Presidents may challenge specific subpoenas as impeding their Article II functions." "And although we affirm while Justice Thomas would vacate, we agree that this case will be remanded to the District Court."" https://www.scotusblog.com/ Clinton v. Jones was wrongly decided years ago, IMO. I have always thought it so.

[NImerc]

we agree that this case will be remanded to the District Court.

---

So, reading elsewhere that this case will go back and eventually end up in front of the SCOTUS again? Is there any chance at all these are released before the election?

[dowcaet]

The real enemy of America is not the man sitting in the White House. Its true enemies are the people that sit on our courts, the control freaks who populate our federal government, and the idiots in Congress and the media. All these entities are destroying the country just to get one man! It’s beyond shame that so many Americans can’t see what’s in store for all of us if they vote for Biden and his ilk.