Posted on 07/20/2020 4:26:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
I know it seems like a lifetime ago, but if youll think back to the beginning of this pandemic you might recall that we were originally told we needed to flatten the curve so that hospitals wouldnt be overwhelmed. Ah, the good old days. Remember? The understanding was that this was a highly-contagious, fast-spreading virus that would have to run its course, but if it ran its course at current speeds hospitals would crash, thus causing anyone in need of their services to suffer as well. It seemed like most people understood that. Unless they isolated completely, most anyone who was susceptible to getting the virus was going to get it eventually. Since it was here and already spreading, there was no actual stopping it, not forever, so lets just manage it and protect those most vulnerable to the best of our ability.
While Ive never been for the lockdowns and in fact spoke out against them at the time, part of me could at least understand the logic of some measures to slow things down, especially given the fear of the unknown that existed at the beginning. There was some common sense in measures intended to slow the spread, even though in reality they didnt actually work all that well. We had 15 days to slow the spread, then 30 more. Then, seemingly overnight, the narrative changed. The expectation went from slow the spread and flatten the curve to, oddly enough, no cases at all.
As we began to find out just how large the infection denominator was, as death rates plummeted infinitely lower than the two to five percent many were fearing at first, as actual deaths declined and flattened to less than 1,000 a day (even using their cooked-up numbers where someone who dies of a car accident or heart disease and had COVID is lumped in as a COVID death), the media-induced panic was only getting started. California is shut down again with calls for other states to do the same, and leftists seemingly wont be happy until masks are legally required at all times on every man, woman, and child from the wilderness of Alaska to the streets of New York City from now until the end of time.
From the virus being deadly to lockdown protesters but benign for George Floyd demonstrators to health officials making mistakes like literally counting a 21-year-old who died of a motorcycle accident in the COVID death count to everything in between, our would-be masters have literally zero credibility. And at this point, theres no more understanding or sympathizing with any aspect of their logic. Not anymore.
Sure, cases are spiking in some areas, but hospitals are thus far managing. We see Chicken Little stories about full hospitals and ICU capacity, but have to look to other reporting to realize that hospitals USUALLY operate at a close-to-full capacity and at least three-fourths of those in most of the surging hospitals arent even COVID patients. Why dont they tell us that in the original stories? Why did they allow the public to think that 85 infants in one Texas county tested positive for COVID in a week when the actual time period was from now until the pandemic began in March? And speaking of babies and shock rona headlines, why isnt the fact that only one of those babies died after being brought to the hospital for unrelated symptoms on the front page right under that headline, or at least in the first couple of paragraphs? Why? To keep the panic alive, of course. Everything, it seems, is related to keeping the panic alive. Its no wonder that fully 52 percent of Americans actually fear dying from a disease that now has at least a 99.8 percent survival rate.
None of it makes any sense. We are now told the area-specific lockdowns, forced-masking, and social distancing measures will remain in place until there is a vaccine, despite the fact that there has never been a successful vaccine for any coronavirus strain. In other words, area-specific lockdowns, masking, and social distancing measures will remain in place forever ... for a disease that 99.8 percent of people who contract survive and that mostly kills people who have lived beyond the average human lifespan already (those lives are important too and should be protected, obviously, but there are ways to do that without society-killing measures like weve done).
One of the seemingly illogical aspects of hiding from this virus, and perhaps the thing that bothers those of us who like to use logic and common sense along with data and analytics to analyze our predicament, is the panic-stricken approach the media and our leaders are taking. Theres an obvious reason the virus is in places like Houston and Phoenix now and not in New York City: its simply their turn. In other words, would it not stand to reason that every major metropolitan area is likely going to take a turn with this virus, no matter what they do? Sure, Governor Cuomo could have saved half the deaths by not sending infected patients into nursing homes, but regardless, the virus hit New York City first because it is a highly traveled international destination. America is a big country that spans across several time zones. Its ridiculous to compare us to Italy, Denmark, Japan, or the U.K., except that New York City alone might be compared to Italy in the sense that both places are winding down in infections after losing more than 30,000 of their people.
Why are they winding down, and whats to stop them from picking up again? The media doesnt believe in herd immunity, apparently, but its the only thing that makes sense. Without it, any little outbreak is bound to spread exponentially. The pattern, established time and again, seems to be six to eight weeks of spread in a specific area, then a winding down. Not because of masks, not because of lockdowns, but because herd and T cell immunity eventually do their thing. In New York City, for example, Dr. Scott Gottlieb estimated in late June that 25 percent of residents likely have had the disease. That, combined with T cells currently existing in many in response to fighting common colds, could be more than enough to do the trick.
In other words, we can hide, but not forever. And when we do come out, especially in any densely populated area, coronavirus will be there, waiting for us. This fact, of course, belies any of the governments efforts to stop the spread. It belies the hysteria about cases! cases! cases! Suppose we do magically lockdown again in all 50 states, then emerge a month later, after untold suffering and a ravaged economy. When we do emerge, is anyone naive enough to think the virus will just be gone? Inevitably someone will have it, somewhere, and theyll spread it again. Maybe itll take a few weeks to get going, but get going it will. Viruses virus. Its what they do.
Given that, what is the point of locking down, as long as hospitals can manage the flow? What is the point of masks, even if they worked? Sometimes, the best way out of a dire predicament is to power right through it. Thankfully, our treatments have improved as has our capability to protect the vulnerable and those in nursing homes. That, combined with some form of herd immunity, is the only way out, as anyone with some intellectual honesty and a lick of common sense can surmise. No matter what we do, thats how coronavirus will end. The question is, how long will it take, and how much pain will we do to ourselves in the process?
the purpose of the mask, the virus, the CDC, the FIB,
is SEDITION.
NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
They could not murder the ELECTED PRESIDENT so they
attacked all Americans using the Gates/Xi/WHO/FauXi
SARS virus THEY MADE.
THIS is CW2 with the DNC now having used chemical
weapon with a foreign government.
The mask says: if you can pretend that a man who wears a wig and lipstick is a woman, you can pretend that a 20 cent mask will prevent the virus.
More wasted words on something that we already knew. It would be worthwhile if other people other than the echo chamber read the editorial. The author would be better served to go pick up some paint and join that Pastor in painting over the murals doing something useful.
Pretty much my view in the issue. It ain’t going away folks. Time to learn to live with it.
Fauxi funded research grants to Wuhan lab to fund risky virus research that was illegal in the U.S.
https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/why-us-outsourced-bat-virus-research-to-wuhan/
-Fauxi in 2017: President Trump Will Be Challenged By a Surprise Global Disease Outbreak. What did he know?
Oh, it all makes perfect sense if you keep one thing firmly in mind...
This was NEVER about public health.
The words are not wasted if they are repeated.
This a highly logical case that must be made to our public officials.
Forwarding this piece to your state representative would be a good start.
“One of the seemingly illogical aspects of hiding from this virus, and perhaps the thing that bothers those of us who like to use logic and common sense along with data and analytics to analyze our predicament, is the panic-stricken approach the media and our leaders are taking.”
“None of it makes any sense.”
Struck by the naivity of the author. None of what he is reporting is “illogical” and contrary to what he says it all makes perfect sense as long as you understand what the goal is of the America haters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.