Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpeedyInTexas

I haven’t heard anyone mention this, but, remember that up until the start of the 2017 hearings for Gorsuch on the Supreme Court, the Senate rules allowed for filibusters of Supreme Court nominees.

Chuck Schumer tried to start a filibuster over Gorsuch’s nomination, and the response was that Mitch McConnell went for the “nuclear option”, and changed the rules so that they can’t filibuster Supreme Court nominees any longer.

If the filibuster rule were still in place, I bet that a nomination now would be filibustered, on the “high principle” that we are so close to the election, that we shouldn’t be filling a Supreme Court vacancy now.

So for some of what is going on, we can thank Chuck Schumer for starting a chain of events which led to the end of Supreme Court filibusters.


20 posted on 09/22/2020 7:14:15 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Obviously a filibuster would kill the nomination, but it was Harry Reid who used the nuclear option of majority vote on Judicial Appointments and thus the extension by Mitch on Gorsuch.


30 posted on 09/22/2020 7:19:14 AM PDT by Religion and Politics (It is time for more than one denomination of "Political Correctness".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

That’s why going all in all the time is dumb. No way would they have killed the filibuster now but at the beginning of the Trump administration replacing Scalia it was a way easier argument to make.


49 posted on 09/22/2020 7:31:58 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson