Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats To Introduce Bill To Term Limit Supreme Court Justices…
Yahoo ^ | 9/24/2020 | Andrew Chung

Posted on 09/24/2020 4:54:30 PM PDT by antidemoncrat

Democrats in of the House of Representatives will introduce a bill next week to limit the tenure of U.S. Supreme Court justices to 18 years from current lifetime appointments, in a bid to reduce partisan warring over vacancies and preserve the court's legitimacy.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2020election; andrewchung; corpseburg; demagogicparty; democrats; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; judiciary; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; politicaljudiciary; presstitutes; scotus; smearmachine; supreme; supremecourt; yahoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
So now that SCOTUS might have a conservative majority, the Democrats now want term limits. How about term limits for Congre$$?
1 posted on 09/24/2020 4:54:30 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

That’s nice.


2 posted on 09/24/2020 4:55:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Elections have consequences. We won, you lost. Get over it." --Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Yup, them first. Then I’m sure the people would be for it.


3 posted on 09/24/2020 4:55:49 PM PDT by Pollard (You can’t be for “defunding the police” and against “vigilantism” at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

DOA. Nice try, losers.


4 posted on 09/24/2020 4:56:04 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

I’d be more amenable to an amendment to term limit Congress. Let’s start there.


5 posted on 09/24/2020 4:56:05 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

How about term limits for congress?


6 posted on 09/24/2020 4:57:54 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

I don’t have a huge problem with reasonable limits as it should apply only to members appointed after the legislation is in effect. HOWEVER!!! I have a huge problem with whatever Democrats favor. In this case, beware of the camel’s nose under the edge of the tent.


7 posted on 09/24/2020 4:58:11 PM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Judges shouldn’t have a job for decades until they drop dead. Ideally they would step down and let other people take over but just not in these people’s mindset. I wouldn’t give such a strict 18 year limit nor would I agree with anything Dems propose just because they are trying to run a scam.


8 posted on 09/24/2020 5:00:24 PM PDT by escapefromboston (Free Assange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Term limits for SCOTUS and Congress, to apply to future members.


9 posted on 09/24/2020 5:01:18 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (This Space For Rant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Send it to the Senate, McConnell Guts it and replaces it with language that adds 6 more Justices to the Court and Deems it Passed.


10 posted on 09/24/2020 5:02:09 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Article III of the Constitution says “The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour.”

No legislation can change that.

Next?


11 posted on 09/24/2020 5:02:12 PM PDT by JOHN ADAMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Wouldn’t limiting the number of nominees and term limits need to be a constitutional amendment? At lest the former.

What if they all die in an attack or plane crash?

This is red meat to stir up the crazies and nothing more.


12 posted on 09/24/2020 5:02:20 PM PDT by laxcoach (Wear a hijab or you are selfish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

Mandatory retirement at 75 or 80 wouldn’t be bad.


13 posted on 09/24/2020 5:02:31 PM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Requires a Constitutional amendment.

Not that Democrats care about the Constitution.


14 posted on 09/24/2020 5:02:33 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

I could support term limits for SCOTUS, but I’d like to see them staggered evenly across years (perhaps one replacement every 2 years if we went with an 18 year term) to avoid disruptive lurches in either direction.

I’d support term limits for Congress too - and I’d like to see them live in their home states and conduct sessions via videoconference. Would make quite a difference if congressional reps had to live among the people they “represent”.


15 posted on 09/24/2020 5:04:08 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

And the Supreme Court would shut this down ASAP as it requires an amendment to the Constitution to do this. As would term limits on the House and Senate.


16 posted on 09/24/2020 5:05:09 PM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Sure they want that. The day after Ginsburg dies.


17 posted on 09/24/2020 5:06:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

I’m not a Constitutional scholar, although I taught it to 7th-graders line-by-line for over a quarter century, so I’m passingly familiar with the document. Section 1 of Article 3 says that Justices/Judges shall “hold their offices during good behavior”. As long as they’re not removed through death, resignation, or impeachment/conviction, they have the job.

To change this requires a Constitutional Amendment, not a bill. You’d think that at least a few Congress Critters would know this.


18 posted on 09/24/2020 5:07:38 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

In other words ... we know we are about to lose the election.


19 posted on 09/24/2020 5:08:06 PM PDT by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

well, personally I am sick of 87 yro judges/congresscritters, etc....especially when they are as feable as RG was.....how unfair and unjust of her to keep hanging on like that...


20 posted on 09/24/2020 5:09:31 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson