NTSB News Conference

MSNBC

[Clinton's a rapist]

Nobody is saying it has to be an accident. We are saying, stop jumping to conclusions.

What conclusions? I saw a bunch of people on this forum yesterday intelligently speculating about the cause of the crash, employing healthy, experience-based skepticism towards the government and its agenda, debunking Pataki's BS spin, and zeroing in correctly on the discrepancies between the theory being pushed by the media and the facts as we knew them. For their pains, these folks got called "tinfoil hatters" and "conspiracy theorists" (uh, hello, there is a massive, murderous conspiracy of Islamic jihadists victimizing the United States right now, or didn't anybody notice?), knee-jerk malcontents, etc. Well, we live and learn, don't we?

[oyez]

NTSB is the most credible govt source.

Source of what?

[LoveUSA]

I share suspicions about TWA 800

Unlike the eyewitnesses to Flight 800, the eyewitnesses for Flight 587 are all over the media giving their account of the small explosion near the wing attachment.

There will be no cover-up for this one.

[Merovingian]

Of course, one can only state what is reported.. I am always peed when I quote a news source without saying who it is and it turns out to be WRONG!! I try to say "Per MSNBC", or whatever, but at times Im in a hurry and don't do it.

[Merovingian]

They are now saying there are "more questions than answers" about the cause of the crash

Really? I had not heard that..I keep hearing 'accident' most likely, but then I have only been getting snippets of news today.

[Shooter 2.5]

If there was a cover up with FLT 800, why is it that you know about 700+ witnesses? Could it be that this crash fell into a neighborhood in broad daylight as opposed to a crash in the ocean at night where people may or may not have seen something?

[Gargantua]

Most people understand what it is they do not understand. You do not.

Uh... ...right. Well put. Them's some debating skills you've got there. Boy, you sure told me, huh?

[MindBender26]

This is an auto-reply from FR.

The person to whom you sent your message has asked that your messages not be posted to him.

That is because you are probably foolish to beleive even your own posts. :~)

[Gargantua]

Duh, yahhh. (Drool, giggle, drool some more)

Dat Gummint nebber lied to me nor nobody. 'S'a'fakt.

(drool, giggle)

[coloradan]

I also seem to remember that very few of these "700" witnesses actually reported a missile. When it was figured out exactly what each person really said there were only a small handful with that story.

What is more important than how many reported a "missile," which is admittedly rather small, is how many reported something that violently conflicts with the NTSB/CIA official story. Just over a hundred people reported seeing something rise from the surface - which conflicts with the plane blowing up in midair, and then ascending. Several people also reported seeing "streaks", "flares", or "fireworks" that glowed a different color than that of the petroleum fireball that they also saw. Some of them saw or heard multiple explosions - yet, how many times can a center wing tank explode? Meyer and others saw "white" explosions before the large yellowish or orangish fireball explosion. HE ordnance explodes whitish, but jet fuel explosions don't.

What is your explanation for all these discrepencies?

[Real Cynic No More]

With all due respect, at the time of this article and on into Monday night and Tuesday morning, based on the other news reports I read, the statements were that there was no evidence of terrorism; they did not state that terrorism had been ruled out. That particular article mis-stated what the officials were saying.

[MrBambaLaMamba]

"...know that the pilot drank from a stream in North Carolina last week..."

Did you also hear the report that last week Eric Rudolph was seen in the vicinity of that very stream!