Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Selective Moral Outrage - Looking beyond Trent Lott’s gaffe.
National Review Online ^ | 12/10/02 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 12/10/2002 11:04:21 AM PST by wcdukenfield

On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, Bill Clinton traveled to Fayetteville, Arkansas to honor the life of the late Arkansas senator, J. William Fulbright by dedicating a seven-foot-tall bronze statute of the man.

According to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, "The $100,000 sculpture is the final [expenditure] of an $850,000 fundraising campaign for a project to honor Fulbright. The $750,000 fountain was dedicated October 24, 1998."

Among other things, Clinton said, "If [Fulbright] were here today, I'm sure he would caution us not to be too utopian in our expectations, but rather utopian in our values and vision."

And back on May 5, 1993, in what the Washington Post characterized as a "... moving 88th birthday ceremony for former senator William Fulbright, President Clinton last night bestowed the Presidential Medal of Freedom on the man he described as a visionary humanitarian, a steadfast supporter of the values of education, and 'my mentor.'" Clinton added, "It doesn't take long to live a life. He made the best of his, and helped us to have a better chance to make the best of ours.…The American political system produced this remarkable man, and my state did, and I'm real proud of it."

Of course, the man Clinton was praising, who he called his "mentor," who supposedly embraced utopian values and made the world a better place for everyone, was also a rabid segregationist.

In 1956, Fulbright was one of 19 senators who issued a statement entitled the "Southern Manifesto." This document condemned the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. Its signers stated, among other things, that "We commend the motives of those States which have declared the intention to resist forced integration by any lawful means." They stated further, "We pledge ourselves to use all lawful means to bring about reversal of this decision which is contrary to the Constitution and to prevent the use of force in its implementation."

Of course, in 1957, the first serious challenge to Brown occurred in Fulbright's backyard. Fulbright's Democrat colleague, Arkansas Governor Orville Faubus (another early Clinton backer) ordered the National Guard to surround Central High School in Little Rock to prevent nine black students from attending the school. President Dwight Eisenhower dispatched the 101st Airborne Division to protect these teenagers and enforce the Supreme Court's decision.

Fulbright later voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act. And he did so because he believed in separating the races — in schools and other public places. He was a segregationist, heart and soul.

Now, given the turmoil surrounding Trent Lott's foolish statement last week about Strom Thurmond's 1948 presidential campaign, you'd think there would have been at least some outcry when Bill Clinton lionized Fulbright a mere six weeks ago, or when he awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1993. But there was nothing in the Washington Post admonishing Clinton, which today published a scathing editorial against Lott. There was no criticism in the New York Times, which today is running a vicious column by Paul Krugman implying that Lott is an overt racist.

And while I'm on the subject, I don't remember some of the conservatives now voicing outrage at Lott holding Clinton to the same standard either in 1993 or October of this year.

But I'm not making excuses for Trent Lott. He should have apologized for his insensitive comments, and he did. Nor am I making excuses for Strom Thurmond's past. I'm questioning the hypocrisy of selective moral outrage by the Left.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: clinton; fulbright; levin; lott; racism; thurmond
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2002 11:04:21 AM PST by wcdukenfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Yup. But the "gosh, the Dems do it too" stuff is just the mirror-image of Larry Flynt "defending" Clinton by coming out with other folks' skeletons...
2 posted on 12/10/2002 11:05:52 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
If lot had said that Thurmond was a great man and his mentor, not problem. The problem is that he wished for a revised history that would have strengthened segregation. That's different.
3 posted on 12/10/2002 11:12:06 AM PST by BillCompton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
hypocrisy is fundamental to liberalism
4 posted on 12/10/2002 11:12:17 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Yup. But the "gosh, the Dems do it too" stuff is just the mirror-image of Larry Flynt "defending" Clinton by coming out with other folks' skeletons...

Actually, I thought the author was making a completely different point. Clinton excused his behavior by accusing the right (often falsely) of acting the same way. The author is not excusing Lott's conduct and is quite explicit about that.

Rather the author is pointing out the hypocricy by the left and it's media organs. They go hysterical about Lott and ignore the N word by Byrd and ignore Fullbright's history when Clinton gives him an award.

The point was that the left's PC hysteria is not motivated by any real concern for PC. Rather, it is a weapon to be used selectively to silence opponents and to gain political power.

That said, Lott spoke inappropriately and we should not be hypocrits. When one of ours misbehaves, we usually take him to task, eg Richard Nixon and now Trent Lott.

5 posted on 12/10/2002 11:12:35 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Gaffe's azz.
6 posted on 12/10/2002 11:12:45 AM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
Fair 'nough.

Too many Freepers are willing to say "well, it's from the left, yada yada yada."

The best we can hope for is that this was just a moment's idiocy, one of many.

7 posted on 12/10/2002 11:15:22 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
hypocrisy is fundamental to liberalism

Good use of words. Maybe that'll be the title of Anne Coulter's next book: Liberal Fundamentalism

8 posted on 12/10/2002 11:18:28 AM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Unfortuantely, all these skeletons in our history are there to find for anyone looking. I thing the point is not "where we were" but "how far we have come," and in such a short time.

There is the issue of "Will this argument work?" But there is also the issue of truth. Lott didn't mean it the way Jesse Jackson and others are choosing to take and exploit it. I think that's the point in exposing Clinton. Not to get anyone off the hook or say "they do it too." Rather, the point is to say "Clinton was not endorsing segregation and neither was Lott."

Do you see what I am trying to say? I hope. (I can be articulation challenged sometimes, lol.)

9 posted on 12/10/2002 11:24:43 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
You are presuming a level playing field that does not exist.

Lott has got to go.
10 posted on 12/10/2002 11:28:21 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
I don't defend what Lott said, because it was DUMB, he should have known better than to say things like that. He knows about the GOP hating race baiters in the media and Congress and how they're just waiting to bash the GOP over the head with anything

What makes me want to vomit, however, are these high and mighty hypocrite RATS like Al Gore(whose father voted against the Civil Rights Act and whose family forced their black maid to sit in a hot car while they dined in "Whites Only" restaurants). The recent "enshrinement" of a man like segregationist Fulbright as recently as six weeks ago (without a peep from the NYT and WP leftists) is equally vomit-inducing.

The left wing GOP-bashing hate machine is full gear today, but you didn't hear a thing when Cruz Bustamente used the N-word or when the KKK recruiter had his "slips of the tongue."

Let all those hypocrite @ssholes foam at the mouth over this. Lott apologized. Even if he does resign, I guarantee you the race-baiters WILL NOT let the matter go. They won't be happy until Lott blows his brains out, or forks over all his worldly possessions for "Reparations" to Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

Frankly, I wanted Lott out as majority leader for a while (for being a spineless), but then who will fill his shoes? It better be someone who's an improvement!!!

BTW, the reason that Little Tommy D@sshole actually excused Lott's comments is because he wants that spineless, ineffective wooss as majority leader.

11 posted on 12/10/2002 11:34:40 AM PST by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
There is a big difference between honoring a segregationist and honoring his segregationist behavior, and Trent Lott illustrated this by doing the latter when he should have done the former.

Going on about how Thurmond's Dixiecrat segregationist presidential campaign should have succeeded was both unnecessary and assinine, unless, of course, Lott was sincere in wishing for the success of racial segregation, which is what primarily defined the difference between the "Dixiecrats" and the Democrats. In referring to that campaign specifically, Lott was, in no uncertain terms, waxing nostalgic about an openly segregationist endeavor.

I expect better from a man in his position of national trust, and I don't apologize for doing so.

Lott apologized, but I think he deserves every lash the press and his colleagues deal out to him.

12 posted on 12/10/2002 11:37:20 AM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
You are probably right, though it is terribly unfair and unjust.
13 posted on 12/10/2002 11:38:15 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Lott also needs to go because he is a coward. Daschle knows how to rule with an iron fist. The next Republican Senate leader needs to follow in his footsteps.
14 posted on 12/10/2002 11:41:13 AM PST by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
That should be Orval Faubus, not Orville.

According to William Doyle in An American Insurrection: The Battle of Oxford, Mississippi, 1962 Faubus had promised Eisenhower that the Arkansas National Guard would protect the black students who were trying to attend Central High School, but then double-crossed Ike.

15 posted on 12/10/2002 11:50:20 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillCompton
The problem is that he wished for a revised history that would have strengthened segregation.

Please, tell me, where forced integration has prospered Americans in general and blacks in particular?

It anything, it has lead to urban blight and suburban expansion, i.e., natural segregation.

16 posted on 12/10/2002 11:51:28 AM PST by A2J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A2J
The comment in reply No. 5 got it exactly right. I don't see this article as even a defense of Lott, but rather a discussion of the hypocracy and political demagoguery of the Left.

They've tolerated far worse comments and far worse intentions from Democrats for the last 50 years. They know that Lott is not a segragationist. They know he's not a racist. This is the usual race-baiting.

In short, the media claims moral outrage, but is very selective about - just like the article says.
17 posted on 12/10/2002 12:08:40 PM PST by wcdukenfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Clinton said, "If [Fulbright] were here today, I'm sure he would caution us not to be too utopian in our expectations, but rather utopian in our values and vision."

since when are liberals utopian in their values???? sounds to me like Fulbright was a conservative
18 posted on 12/10/2002 12:15:08 PM PST by housethatruthbuilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Not that I am for it, but why all the talk against segregation? I don't know how many responses I read were that of black Americans but it appears to me that black Americans want nothing to do with America anyway. They identify themselves with Africa even though they have been in this country as long as any of the whites. They manufacture clothes with names like "FUBU", an acronym for "For Us By Us." Black Americans are doing just fine segregating themselves. There are black universities, black fraternities and sororities, black beauty pageants and blacks television stations. So is all of this banter about Lott's gaffe just PC posturing or what?
19 posted on 12/10/2002 12:18:52 PM PST by KamMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Where, can we, as white folk, demand an apology and resignation of Maxine Waters, for her outrageous call on the black community, to "quit burning your own neighborhoods, go to the white man's neighborhoods..."
This was stated on Los Angeles television, that carried throughout the state, following the Rodney King verdict, and subsequent riots. I wonder if Reginal Denny has a case against her for inciting violence???
20 posted on 12/10/2002 12:32:31 PM PST by Terridan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson