The Media's Gay Mafia "Queers" the News

Middle American News/A Different Drummer ^ | July, 2003 | Nicholas Stix

[GrandMoM]

PING

[WorldWatcher1]

Excuse me ... I thought News Corp owned WASHINGTON POST - not New York Post.

Nope...NYPost, see list of NewsCorp newspapers here: http://www.newscorp.com/operations/newspapers.html

It's their only U.S. paper.

[Tahoe3002]

You really hit the nail on the head!!!
I refuse to call them gay or lesbian...THEY ARE HOMOSEXUALS. I am not a homophobe, I am homo-disgusted!

[redangus]

The Indianapolis Star has been running about 1 pro-homosexual story a week lately, and numerous pro-homo editorials and letters/week. For an area as conservative as Central Indiana that is almost like shouting approval from the roof tops. And no there was no reporting about the Dirkhising story, but a blizzard of articles about the Shepard incident.

[redangus]

I have longed made it my habit to not use the term gay just for that reason. I also enforce it on my friends and family members. If they are talking about homosexuals then they must use that term or lesbian or we do not converse about the subject. You are absolutley right in your point about letting them control the language. I have always said that those who control the language control the discussion and those that control the discussion win the argument and those that win the argument make the rules. It is time we start controlling the language and take back our country.

[Slyfox]

about 1 pro-homosexual story a week lately

I think you have a good reason not to buy the paper anymore.

[CyberAnt]

Okay - thanks!

[mrustow]

The gay mafia -- openly gay activists who pass as journalists -- seeks to "out" high-profile, professional athletes as homosexual, in order to mainstream a sexual orientation which most Americans consider perverted, and apparently as an assault on the last preserve of the traditional masculinity they have declared war on. And if no gay superstars are handy, activists will invent some.

That's a good name for them. The idea is to change public opinion by imposing their beliefs on them and the younger the better. Their social conditioning starts at Elementary school with children as young as 5-6 years old. Homosexual and lesbian activists are invited to Schools under the banner of diversity to brainwash young minds by teaching them that homosexual families are just like any other family, and that they should be accepted and treated with respect. However, under the excuse of "respect," they are actually working on conversion and recruitment.

My favorite stealth education story is, IIRC, from massnews. A woman who worked for the state (MA) told a group of parents with kids in the public schools, about the wonderful gay sex she was teaching kids -- stuff like fisting. Unbeknownst to the "sex educator," a parent tape-recorded the lecture, which was perfectly legal for her to do. When the parent publicized what gays were pushing on kids, the sex pusher SUED the parent, claiming that the latter had violated HER privacy rights, by taping the lecture. Naturally, the sex pusher was supported by any number of gay activist groups. I believe that the courts refused to accept her "privacy" claim. (But that was pre-Lawrence.)

The claim by a civil servant, that she had privacy rights over the public lecture she had given at taxpayer expense, was the last straw for me, regarding gay claims about ... anything. The same phonies would frequently complain about "privatization": meanwhile, they seek to variously privatize or publicize everything, according to what they consider expedient at any given moment.

[mrustow]

"In February, Hall of Fame pitcher Sandy Koufax ended his 48-year relationship with the Los Angeles Dodgers, due to a defamatory story a reporter planted in the New York Post, insinuating that Koufax was a homosexual."

Sandy Koufax was not gay, who really cares.

Answer: Richard Johnson, whoever fed him the phony story (assuming he didn't make it up himself), and thousands of gay activists within and without the media. If nobody cared, why do think people would conspire to smear him as gay, Einstein? I also think you're missing the point of the story -- gay media activists are indifferent to the truth.

[mrustow]

What you have said in this post, the Jim Dwyer segment...IMHO, Could be applied to any Media Outlet ABCNNBCBS/NYT/LAT/WP/BG ..."the Sins of Ommissions". :|

The problem today, is that the censorship is so powerful, that you rarely find a mainstream journalist who will write, or the managing editor who will publish, the sort of story Dwyer was able to get into print 12 years ago. If nobody breaks the black wall of silence, no one will know about the sins of omission.

[mrustow]

Frankly, it's this simple: the American elites that run the country have finally decided that they've had enough of America's burgeois, religion-based value system, and they're just not going to put with it anymore. I predict that what we've seen the last couple of weeks is merely the tip of the iceberg. The culture war is lost, and I'm not sure if there was ever really a chance of winning. I think they're shooting for a European-style hedonistic culture where committing adultery is considered not only normal, but is actually expected.

I agree with much of what you say, with one proviso: some of the elites have decided to gut America's culture, but other elites (alleged conservatives -- neo and paleo -- in academia and the media) know what is happening, but are too cowardly or too lazy to fight back.

[mrustow]

My husband has a lot of homosexual patients. For the most part, they're depressed, alcoholic and suicidal.

Is your husband a sawbones or a headshrinker?

[mommadooo3]

As William McGowan reports, in the month after Jesse Dirkhising's murder, only 46 stories were devoted to his fate. "The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story altogether and continued to do so through the March 2001 trial of one of the murderers, which resulted in a conviction. (The other assailant later pled guilty.)" Dirkhising's murderers are now fighting their convictions.

OK. If the Supreme Court ruled that there is NO 'sodomy' law, then Jesse died in a private/personal act. RIGHT?

[Gritty]

Kindly stop confusing all the gay-promoters and Liberaltarians with facts!

[onyx]

The latter. :-)

[GrandMoM]

PING

[GrandMoM]

Kindly stop confusing all the gay-promoters and Liberaltarians with facts!....I have a whole lot more!

[Victoria Delsoul]

When the parent publicized what gays were pushing on kids, the sex pusher SUED the parent, claiming that the latter had violated HER privacy rights, by taping the lecture. Naturally, the sex pusher was supported by any number of gay activist groups. I believe that the courts refused to accept her "privacy" claim. (But that was pre-Lawrence.)

Well, there is no stopping them now. The Supreme Court's ruling has opened the doors to dangerous ramifications, one of the them is that schools will be free to teach children that sodomy is alright and normal, just like heterosexual couples, and homosexuals will be working to lower the age of consent and other perversions.

[Victoria Delsoul]

"Gay mafia" is a good (and an accurate) name for them, but where does that leave NAMBDA? -- an off-shoot or their headquarters?

Hmmm, the Godfather?

[Rummyfan]

When did that happen????