Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElRushbo
Odd that this would be unanimous. Didn't this panel include the three judges who originally decided to delay the vote?
7 posted on 09/23/2003 9:11:33 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
No, none of the three judge panel were on this eleven judge panel.

"Unanimous" in this instance means there is no written disenting opinion
9 posted on 09/23/2003 9:13:20 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
Didn't this panel include the three judges who originally decided to delay the vote?

No. The original ruling disenfranchised 400k of absentee voters who had already cast the vote. This was a slam dunk decision.
10 posted on 09/23/2003 9:13:24 AM PDT by BillCompton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson