Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JESUS CHRIST: THE ORIGINAL AND BEST POSSIBILITY THINKER!
Heaven | 6/12/2013 | HTRN

Posted on 06/12/2013 11:25:22 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck

OK, this is very much a theological vanity. But I don't think it is in vain.

John 3:16-17. For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

Very familiar passage of Christian scripture, though John 3:17 is somewhat less often quoted.

Notice something here, however. "God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world."

Turns out this has some very important spiritual/psychological consequences, for anyone willing to believe.

There's a joke about fundamentalists (and indeed I am a fundamentalist) that accuses them of being "no fun, all damn, and very little mental."

I won't address the fun and mental parts, but I'd like to point out that a very large problem with the whole unsaved world is that it in fact IS "all damn." (Not knowing God it can't bless; all it knows is sin, and sin is the damning of God's desirous will.) And many Christians are "mostly damn" because their faith is not deeply radical; they don't appreciate the fact that John 3:17 brings a hiatus to damnation.

Well, damning, while it can help contain sin, has a steep spiritual cost. Damning means wishing a spiritual death. Psychologically it freezes thoughts, forbidding one to even visit certain areas of thought.

So if we could stop damning, we could unfreeze many thoughts... worth thinking about so to speak?

Now wait, you say, if we stop damning then we have no means to motivate anyone, even Christians, to avoid what's sin... turns out that is not so. There is another means: God's love, and the fear of violating it.

Let me ask you, how often have you reflexively said "God damn" this or that?

If John 3:17 is on the level, could that be wrong? (This is not the time to damn?)

If damning now is wrong, and I am convinced that it is wrong, then many helpful consequences follow.

I don't have time to elaborate on this. But I think it is worth considering for Christians. It could help open their minds to more possibilities of effective usage of the gospel if they make some kind of conscious effort to stop damning, even if with imperfect success. It does not mean that they refrain from calling wrong things wrong, or refrain from being angry at wrongs, but it means that they do so with grace and perspective. That the enemy is not (now) humans; it is Satan, and we want as many humans saved as possible.


TOPICS: Activism
KEYWORDS: vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2013 11:25:22 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

“Have to post”? Why not just look it up in the bible?


3 posted on 06/12/2013 11:29:59 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Whatever promise that God has made, in Jesus it is yes. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: HiTech RedNeck
I was told I was a heretic to dare to say that those whom Christ has saved or those who are in Christ that it's a utter impossibility for them to go to hell.
Why would Christ save those and then condemn them to hell ?
Or is it ? that those who believe that even the saved ones in Christ can be condemned to hell do not believe in the all powerful power of Christ's blood to save ? they do not believe in the blood atonement and it's power to save ?
I would venture to say and even dare to say that those who do not believe that Christ's blood is all sufficient to save are and are of the spirit of the anti-christ... they deny Christ's power to save.
The anti-christs want to deny that Christ even has the ability to save those in whom he came to save and that the eternal life that he promised is not forever nor eternal.
5 posted on 06/12/2013 11:39:01 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Those who reject Christ and his ability to save are condemned already.


6 posted on 06/12/2013 11:40:37 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: HiTech RedNeck

God has the final word.

I’d suggest you behave as such.


8 posted on 06/12/2013 11:47:15 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Ok what is the difference between “sons of God” and “only begotten son”


9 posted on 06/12/2013 11:52:59 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
“only begotten son” is the chosen one , i.e. the anointed one to go and save his people.
The sons of God are those who are saved.

Romans 8:14:
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.


10 posted on 06/12/2013 12:08:57 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
Why would Christ save those and then condemn them to hell ?

So if the Son sets you free, you are truly free. -- Jn 8:36

11 posted on 06/12/2013 12:09:34 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: HiTech RedNeck
There's a joke about fundamentalists (and indeed I am a fundamentalist) that accuses them of being "no fun, all damn, and very little mental."

That's pretty good - I may have to start quoting it in the future!

Fundamentalist: A term created during the turn-of-the-20th-century Protestant church splits to define those who held to the “fundamentals” of Christianity—the inerrancy of the Bible, the virgin birth of Jesus and his literal resurrection from the dead. The term is now considered pejorative. (Wheaton College philosophy professor Alvin Plantinga famously observed, “The full meaning of the term...can be given by something like ‘stupid sumbitch whose theological opinions are considerably to the right of mine.’”)
-- from the thread New Kids In The Flock

13 posted on 06/12/2013 12:12:26 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Romans 8 verse 1:
1. There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Those who are in Christ ? there is now no condemnation that they face from God.... for who shall condemn ?

Same chapter :

33. Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth.

34. Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.

For we were in Christ at the cross when God passed his judgment upon Christ in our stead.
God condemned sin in the flesh, Christ's flesh.
God's elect ? his loved ones ? those who are saved and are in Christ ? God's judgment has already passed over them... so how can God or any judicial judgment be placed upon them again ? that would be double jeopardy.
14 posted on 06/12/2013 12:17:10 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Behold the Lamb of God who was slain before the foundations of this world. For he was already chosen to die on the cross way before this world was ever created.. so man had no part in it at all.
15 posted on 06/12/2013 12:19:23 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
I was told I was a heretic to dare to say that those whom Christ has saved or those who are in Christ that it's a utter impossibility for them to go to hell.

Why would Christ save those and then condemn them to hell ?

Because salvation comes in two parts: 1) Believing in God's promise. 2) Doing God's will.

Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:

25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.

26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:

27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

16 posted on 06/12/2013 1:13:18 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Interesting argument.


17 posted on 06/12/2013 1:31:11 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
And what is God's will ?

To believe on him in whom God sent.


John

27. Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.
( Noticed is says: which the Son of man shall give unto you ?
It's not from man's efforts, it's given from above, salvation is given from above, not earned through man's afforts.)
28. Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?

29. Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

In Matthew 7 of those in who Jesus told to depart from him are those who practiced " religion " and had no saving faith in him, nor a relationship with him.... He never " KNEW " them.... that word " KNEW " is a word for relationship....

23. And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

That work of iniquity is because they are still left in their sins because they still practice man's religion... not a relationship relation with God or saving faith.
As Jesus once said to the religious leaders, so they say they see ? yet they remain in their sins.

18 posted on 06/12/2013 1:52:09 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Those who build their house on sinking sand are those who placed their trust in man's religion, and man's power, and things of this world.
Those who's house did not crumble in the storm are those who placed their trust on the solid rock of Jesus Christ.
The firm foundation of Jesus Christ.
These sayings Jesus is talking about is HIM.
He is talking about himself as he is the Savior.
The will of the father ? is that none should parish but repent and be saved through his son Jesus Christ.
The will of the father is to believe on the one in whom God sent.
19 posted on 06/12/2013 1:58:37 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
27. Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed. ( Noticed is says: which the Son of man shall give unto you ?

Notice how it also says, "Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life"?

Salvation comes from believing and doing.

29. Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

But, Jesus also said that belief on him is not enough. Neither did the apostles.

Doing the will of the Father is not just believing on the Promise through Christ, but also on doing the Will of the Father, as Jesus himself did.

25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?

27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.

28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.

29 But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?

30 And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.

31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.

32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.

33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,

34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.

35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.

36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?

37 And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

...

James 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?

15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,

16 And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?

17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.

19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?

22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?

23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.

24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?

26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also. Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?font color=red

20 posted on 06/12/2013 2:52:38 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson