I agree that labels such a "homosexual," "gay," etc. can signify some connection of "gay pride", i.e. the out-and-prouid mentality. That's a big red flag. "Gay" didn't exist before there was a "gay movement."
In the past, I would have said, "So if you're Christian, don't call yourself 'gay' anymore." But I'm reconsidering that now.
I now think there are some reasons why some people would keep the term "homosexual" or even "gay" or "lesbian" while nevertheless being celibate and Christian, and free from the sin. For one thing, the same-sex attraction may remain, and a person may want to let others know they don't want to be nudged into an inappropriate social or "dating" predicament.
Or it may be something that makes sense for a writer-speaker like Eve Tushnet, to explain in a shorthand manner where she's coming from.
I loved Eve Tushnet's new book, which helped me understand why this makes sense for some.
I remember when gay was a nice word, having a gay old time etc, the movies I watch from the 40`s etc, a tough guy like Clark Gable or Jimmy Stewart could say...we had a gay old time.
I resent that they took such a nice word and brought shame to it.
Yes I want everybody to be saved.
If someone insists on calling themselves homosexual and they have left that lifestyle good for them I guess.
If they still say they support gay marriage for others I wont take them seriously though, and if they vote Democrat I certainly dont take anything they say seriously.