Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Little Sisters of the Poor Appeal to Supreme Court for Protection Against Feds
Aletelia ^ | January 9, 2016 | JOHN BURGER

Posted on 01/09/2016 2:21:59 PM PST by NYer

Seventy million dollars is a lot of dough for a group named the Little Sisters of the Poor.

But that's what the religious order says it will be forced to pay the government if they continue to refuse to arrange for insurance that provides lay employees coverage for contraceptives, abortion-inducing drugs and sterilization.

This week, the sisters, along with several Christian colleges and other entities, filed a brief with the Supreme Court, which is hearing a challenge to the Obamacare "Contraceptive Mandate" in March.

The religious objectors are represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and Alliance Defending Freedom.

"The Little Sisters spend their lives taking care of the neediest members of our society -- that is work our government should applaud, not punish," said Mark Rienzi, Becket Fund senior counsel. "The Little Sisters should not have to fight their own government to get an exemption it has already given thousands of other employers, including big companies like Exxon and Pepsi Cola Bottling Company."

The high court has already given the Sisters preliminary protection once, in January 2014. The new brief, which was filed by the Becket Fund along with former Solicitor General Paul Clement, chides the government for its "deceptive labels and diversionary tactics" designed to falsely suggest that the Little Sisters can "opt out" of the mandate.

The Becket Fund explains that the "accommodation" the government has offered religious objectors actually entangles the entities in the objectionable practices. Signing off on the paperwork the government requires for an objector to get an "exemption" gives the government the power to use its own insurance plan to provide the contraceptives and other services.

The brief also explains why the government does not need the Little Sisters at all: it already has many other ways to get contraceptive coverage to those who want it. "Indeed, the government has invested billions of dollars in creating exchanges for the express purpose of making it easy to obtain qualifying insurance when it is not available through an employer. The government cannot explain why those exchanges suffice to advance its goal of getting contraceptive coverage to the tens of millions of [other] people ... yet are not good enough" for the employees of the Little Sisters.

"As Little Sisters of the Poor, we offer the neediest elderly of every race and religion a home where they are welcomed as Christ," said Sister Loraine Marie Maguire, Mother Provincial of the Little Sisters of the Poor. "We perform this loving ministry because of our faith and cannot possibly choose between our care for the elderly poor and our faith, and we shouldn't have to. All we ask is that our rights not be taken away."

The brief was filed on behalf of several other entities facing the same mandate as the Little Sisters, including Becket clients Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Reaching Souls International, Truett-McConnell College, and GuideStone Financial Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention, Houston Baptist and East Texas Baptist Universities, along with Westminster Theological Seminary, South Nazarene University and Geneva College.

"It is ridiculous for the federal government to claim, in this day and age, that it can't figure out how to distribute contraceptives without involving nuns and their health plans," said senior counsel Mark Rienzi.


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortafacients; contraceptives; scotus

1 posted on 01/09/2016 2:21:59 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; Salvation; ...

Prayer, ping!


2 posted on 01/09/2016 2:22:17 PM PST by NYer (Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy them. Mt 6:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

SCOTUS ARE the Feds......


3 posted on 01/09/2016 2:25:21 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

It’s a shame that they have to spend even a dime on this crap.


4 posted on 01/09/2016 2:35:07 PM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Remember: you beanbag the nun and I'll grab the collection box, OK GO!

5 posted on 01/09/2016 2:42:55 PM PST by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

bttt


6 posted on 01/09/2016 2:52:40 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

I’d laugh if I weren’t wincing.


7 posted on 01/09/2016 3:11:50 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (The difference between death and taxes is death doesn't get worse every time Congress is in session.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Feds are not God fearing and no longer think of the eternal consequences of their actions.

We will wait. The judgement on these oppressors will be terrible.


8 posted on 01/09/2016 3:22:02 PM PST by grumpygresh (We don't have Democrats and Republicans, we have the Faustian uni-party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"It is ridiculous for the federal government to claim, in this day and age, that it can't figure out how to distribute contraceptives without involving nuns and their health plans," said senior counsel Mark Rienzi.

It's equally ridiculous for the federal government to be involved in the distribution of contraceptives.

9 posted on 01/09/2016 3:23:06 PM PST by Tax-chick (Maximizing my cultural appropriation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

At the same time the Heathen in the White House ,claims he is a Christian.. What Nonsense. Obama the Destroyer


10 posted on 01/09/2016 4:29:44 PM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

How big of a poop stain is obama to not only be sued by nuns, but by a group of nuns named The Little Sisters of the Poor!


11 posted on 01/09/2016 4:33:45 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Awesome photograph! Someone could do a split screen with Obama and his big frown face. Such a difference between working for G-d, and thinking you are a god.
12 posted on 01/09/2016 5:28:27 PM PST by mlizzy (America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe/Wade has deformed a great nation. -MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
The Little Sisters of the Poor go out every day to beg. That is part of their way.
Our local store owners quietly and regularly give them food, meat and so on.

Those women work for the love of God. Can't beat that in any way.

13 posted on 01/09/2016 6:17:29 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

For a long the Feds have lacked the fear of the Citizenry. God can do with ‘em as He wishes, after We are done w/ ‘em.


14 posted on 01/09/2016 6:18:03 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Are the Muslims being forced to pay for abortion, contraceptives, etc. for their employees? What about the Scientologists or the Seventh Day Adventists?
15 posted on 01/09/2016 6:42:51 PM PST by mia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Agreed, however, Rienzi is making a claim that’s directly germane to the case. In order to force religious people to act contrary to their conscience, the law (Religious Freedom Restoration Act, specifically) requires the government to show there is no other practical way to accomplish their objective. Rienzi is pointing out what a silly claim this is, since there are clearly other ways to facilitate access to contraception that don’t require the LSOtP to compromise their beliefs.


16 posted on 01/10/2016 11:04:29 AM PST by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Oh, I see. I missed that point.


17 posted on 01/10/2016 1:47:01 PM PST by Tax-chick (Maximizing my cultural appropriation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson