Skip to comments.POPE FRANCIS CONDEMNS EUROPE’S ANCIENT WALLS AGAINST ISLAM
Posted on 02/24/2017 8:32:43 PM PST by NYer
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center
Pope Francis continues to argue for two interrelated points that, while seemingly humane, compromise Western nations and expose their citizens to danger.
He reiterated his first point earlier this month when he said, I appeal not to create walls but to build bridges. Francis has made this appeal frequently, both figuratively (when imploring Western nations not to close their doors against more incoming Muslim migrants), and literallyincluding by characterizing Donald Trumps proposal to build a U.S.-Mexico wall as not Christian.
Francis reiterated his second point a few days ago when he said, Muslim terrorism does not exist. His logic is that, because there are Christians who engage in criminal and violent activitiesand yet no one blames Christianity for their behaviorso too should Islam not be blamed when Muslims engage in criminal and violent activities.
In this, the Catholic pope appears unable or unwilling to make the pivotal distinction between violence committed in accordance with religious teachings (Islam) and violence committed in contradiction of religious teachings (Christianity).
But theres another relevant and often overlooked irony: every morning Francis wakes up in the Vatican and looks out his window, he sees a very large and visible reminder that gives the lie to both his argument against walls and his argument in defense of Islam. I speak of the great walls surrounding Vatican City, more specifically the Leonine Walls.
Context: A couple of years after Islamic prophet Muhammad died in 632, his followers erupted out of Arabia and conquered the surrounding lands of non-Muslims in the name of Islamic jihad. In a few decades, they had conquered two-thirds of what was in the 7th century Christendom. They took all of the Middle East, North Africa, and Spain, until they were finally stopped at Tours in central France (732). By the late 9th century, jihadi incursions had transformed the Mediterranean into a Muslim lake; the major islandsSicily, Crete, Rhodes, Malta, Cypruswere conquered, and the European coast was habitually raided for booty and slaves.
According to the most authoritative and contemporary Muslim chroniclesthose of al-Waqidi, al-Baladhuri, al-Tabari, al-Maqrizi, etc.all this was done because Islam calls on its followers to conquer the lands of infidels.
It was in this context that, in 846, Muslim fleets from North Africa landed near Rome. Unable to breach the walls of the Eternal City, they sacked and despoiled the surrounding countryside, includingto the consternation of Christendomthe venerated and centuries-old basilicas of St. Peter and St. Paul. The Muslim invaders intentionally desecrated the tombs of the revered apostles and stripped them of their treasures, including a large golden cross. Pope Leo IV (847-855) responded by building large walls and fortifications along the right bank of the Tiber to protect the sacred sites from further Muslim raids. Completed by 852, the walls were in most places 40 feet high and 12 feet thick.
Further anticipating the crusades against Islam by over two centuriesand thus showing how they were a long time comingPope Leo decreed that any Christian who died fighting Muslim invaders would gain heaven. After him and for the same reasons, Pope John VIII offered remission of sins for those who died fighting Islamic invaders. Such was the existential and ongoing danger Muslims caused for Christian Europemore than two centuries before Pope Urbans call for the First Crusade in 1095.
Today, many Muslims, not just of the ISIS-variety, continue to boast that Islam will conquer Rome, the only of five apostolic seesthe other four being Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Constantinoplenever to have been subjugated by jihad. Similarly, Muslims all throughout Europe continue exhibiting the same hostility and contempt for all things and persons non-Islamic, whether by going on church vandalizing sprees and breaking crosses, or by treating infidel women as theirs by right for sex and rape.
In short, Pope Leos walls prove Pope Francis wrong on both counts: yes, walls are sometimes necessary to preserve civilization; and yes, Islam does promote violence and intolerance for the otherfar more than any other religion. This fact is easily discerned by examining the past and present words and deeds of Muslims, all of which evince a remarkable and unwavering continuity of violence for infidels.
More ironically, had it not been for Pope Leos wallsand so many other Christian walls, such as Constantinoples, which kept Islam out of Europe for centuries, and Viennas, which stopped a full-blown jihad as recent as 1683there might not be a pope today to pontificate about how terrible walls are and how misunderstood Islam is. And when Francis accuses those who want to protect their people by building walls of not being Christian, as he did of Trump, he essentially accuses his bettersmen like Pope Leo IV, who did so much to protect and preserve Christendom at a time when Islam seemed to be swallowing up the worldof being no Christians at all.
People have cut this guy a mile of slack because he’s, you know, the Pope. But he’s also a dangerous blithering idiot, put in place by the same nefarious forces that gave us bambi, and needs to shut his holy pie-hole.
He’s off his nut.
Francis is either one utterly ignorant man or one corrupt and all too politically Left-leaning man. Certainly not pope material, IMHO.
Pope Che serves the elites to further their interests.
Yeah, that’s right, buddy. You build the bridges, they’ll blow ‘em up.
Is it possible to impeach a Pope?
Logic is clearly not his strong point--St. Thomas Aquinas he ain't. . .
Here’s an idea...let’s pick an Argentinian liberation theologically trained Jesuit and make him the Pope. What could possibly go wrong?
Frexit is coming.
I can feel it in my bones.
I am certain Francis’ response would be to offer the story of Bernadone’s meeting with Sultan of Egypt Malik al Kamil. It is unfortunate IMHO that the current Francis opted to follow Bernadone when the Church and Christendom needed Xavier. I hold nothing but good feelings for Bernadone, but these times require a saint made of sterner stuff.
Francis is an extremely evil man. Hes not stupid. Its evil.
The rock star popester strikes again—a fool and his stupidity know no bounds. This is one retromingent jackass, and antichrist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.