Posted on 08/02/2019 7:49:16 PM PDT by robowombat
I think he meant to say arguments against evolution have been exonerated...
Or did he mean Darwin has not been exonerated?
No awards ceremonies for such candidates?
HaHa. Welcome home. What took you so long? He finally recognized that evolution is a fable, only accepted because the alternative explanation is clearly untenable to most “erudite” scientists. What a joke. I’ll bet he never read G. A. Kerkuts’ book. https://archive.org/details/implicationsofev00kerk
Correct.
A rehash of all the old, debunked anti-evolution arguments. At least he admits he doesn’t know what he is talking about.
“A rehash of all the old, debunked anti-evolution arguments.”
Which are the debunked arguments he rehashes?
self ping
<< Darwinism has indeed passed beyond a scientific argument as far as they are concerned. You take your life in your hands to challenge it intellectually. They will destroy you if you challenge it.” >>
Behavior similar to that of the global warming cultists.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/mail-bomb-injures-yale-professor
On June 24, 1993, Yale University computer science professor David Gelernter is seriously injured while opening his mail when a padded envelope explodes in his hands.
In the aftermath of the attack on Gelernter, various federal departments established the UNABOM Task Force, which launched an intensive search for the so-called “Unabomber.” The bombings, along with 14 others since 1978 that killed 3 people and injured 23 others, were eventually linked to Theodore John Kaczynski, a former mathematician from Chicago.
Gelernter, who is known for predicting the World Wide Web and has developed many complex computing tools over the years, is today a professor of computer science at Yale, chief scientist at Mirror Worlds Technologies, member of the National Council of the Arts, and a prolific author.
...
In other words, he isn’t a biologist.
“In May, the Claremont Review of Books published a column by Gelernter headlined “Giving Up Darwin.” In it, he explained how his readings and discussions of Darwinian evolution and its competing theories, namely intelligent design, have convinced him Darwin had it wrong.
In particular, he cited Stephen Meyer’s 2013 book Darwin’s Doubt as well as The Deniable Darwin by David Berlinski.”
I read “Darwin’s Doubt” four, five years ago and also the other book by Stephen Meyer, “Signature in the Cell”. I was always a bit of a skeptic, but those two books pushed me way over the edge. They are truly intellectual tour de force and I highly recommend them to anyone interested in evolution or intelligent design.
Here’s a great presentation on “Darwin’s Doubt” by Meyer...
I’m satisfied with the theory that people who believe the evolution of monkey to man do so as justification for their denial of God.
“Which are the debunked arguments he rehashes?”
All of them.
There’s not ‘a missing link’ - all the links are missing.
You have to have the blinders on tightly believe life began randomly.
you are correct, he is related to a friend.
interesting man.
Personally I was convinced to relook at Darwin after reading Darwin’s Black Box by Behe.
I don’t know what happened, but it wasn’t any sort of macro evolution.
Computer Science, eh?
Calling it “Darwinism” tells you all you need to know about the intellectual rigor of this guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.