Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize

Posted on 12/10/2009 3:36:02 PM PST by Zanton

Earlier today in Oslo, Norway, President Barack Obama finally, formally accepted his Nobel Prize for "peace." But where are the internationally-acclaimed prizes for "liberty" and "justice"? These are far worthier goals -- far loftier ideals. Politically speaking, and in other ways too, what the world needs above all else -- today and always -- is individual liberty and universal justice!

If the Nobel Committee is going to embrace questionable, unworthy goals and dubious, lowly ideals, why not sink all the way down to giving out renowned awards for international "security," or even multinational "stability"?

Clearly there are times when peace is desirable -- such as when there are no foreign threats or attacks; such as when no-one is trying to enslave you. But at other times war is desirable -- such as when others are threatening, or attacking, or attempting to conquer and enslave.

But what is always desirable -- a pure, perfect ideal of infinite value -- is freedom and individual rights. This means liberty and justice for all! It's high time the Nobel Committee, or some group far better, starting awarding prestigious Prizes for that!


TOPICS: General Discussion; Issues; RLC News
KEYWORDS: freedom; liberty; nobel; peace

1 posted on 12/10/2009 3:36:02 PM PST by Zanton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zanton

As usual, the most popular words in the commie’s speech were I and Me. What an absolute maggot!!!!


2 posted on 12/10/2009 3:55:20 PM PST by taillightchaser (When a democrat says "The American people" you know the next words out of his mouth will be lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zanton

Obviously if Obama can win the Nobel by inheriting a war and proclaiming the necessity, surely Bush should have won one too.


3 posted on 12/10/2009 3:58:32 PM PST by GoforBroke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser

I actually thought this guy sounded surprisingly a lot like Bush. I think the Nobel Committee maybe regrets giving him the Peace Prize since he made such a good case for war! ;-)


4 posted on 12/10/2009 4:33:04 PM PST by Zanton (a polite & open-minded, but fierce, advocate of classical liberalism & libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoforBroke

Good point. But these Euro-weenie surrender monkeys hate Bush and love Obama.

And “peace” is still a largely irrelevant issue. We need LIBERTY and JUSTICE on this earth — not peace. (And not “democracy” either.)


5 posted on 12/10/2009 4:37:44 PM PST by Zanton (a polite & open-minded, but fierce, advocate of classical liberalism & libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To me, the Nobel Peace Prize lost all value after Al Gore recieved it.


6 posted on 12/10/2009 9:32:11 PM PST by Socially Distorted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Socially Distorted

I agree. But Gandhi, King, Mandela, Arafat, and many others are even WORSE lowlifes, and even MORE undeserving — at least if you assume “peace” secretly means justice.


7 posted on 12/11/2009 8:06:45 AM PST by Zanton (a polite & open-minded, but fierce, advocate of classical liberalism & libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson